10.3 Current and future initiatives to improve the long-term outlook

The long-term outlook for the Reef will depend on decisions and actions taken at a global level to address climate change, and on effective management of threats to the Region’s values. The threats are multiple, cumulative, and intensifying, so management approaches must be constantly evolving and agile (Box 10.1). The urgency of responding to threats currently facing the Reef, combined with the limited time and resources available, compels management to identify, prioritise and safeguard key species, habitats or processes that will enhance the resilience of the Reef ecosystem, including potential climate refugia.2160 Finding more effective ways to plan for, and respond to, changing environmental and social conditions is essential.

This assessment of the long-term outlook for the Region’s ecosystem and its heritage value includes consideration of current management arrangements and relevant management initiatives identified but not yet fully implemented (Figure 10.4). The future initiatives under the Reef 2050 Plan, the Great Barrier Reef Blueprint for Climate Resilience and Adaptation 1984 (Blueprint 2030), and the Reef 2050 Water Quality Improvement Plan 1883 and Reef 2050 Traditional Owner Implementation Plan 1120 set the framework for improving resilience-based management and protection of values. Also considered are the future commitments of the Australian and Queensland governments and partners under the Reef 2050 Plan.

Significant management initiatives continue to protect values and support resilience of the Region. Despite this, and the documented recovery of some key habitats and species (Chapter 8), overall resilience is being challenged. The scientific evidence is clear: the most urgent initiatives are those that will halt and reverse climate change and those that will effectively improve water quality at the regional scale. International forums, national and state energy transition agendas, and partnerships at all levels provide opportunity for advocacy and encouragement around transformative actions for emissions reduction.1984 Further improvements in water quality, protecting and restoring supporting coastal habitats, and reducing fishing pressure on certain fish stocks will support the resilience of the Reef ecosystem in the face of climate change threats. In addition, recent evidence confirms that controlling crown-of-thorns starfish populations represents an essential management tool for enhancing Reef resilience.

Figure 10.4
Current and future initiatives to improve the Region’s values and support resilience
A diagram describing the future initiatives to improve the Region’s values and support resilience.
Box 10.1

Decision-support tools for adaptive management

Faced with an increasing disturbance regime, Reef managers increasingly require effective decision support systems that integrate modelling and monitoring data from across the Region to recommend optimal times and locations for management interventions. 

In the Catchment, scenario modelling validated against observational data is used in setting water quality targets and evaluating the impacts of on-ground management to address land-based runoff. On the Reef, decision-support systems aggregate and integrate: (i) high-quality observational data collected by Marine Park staff, research partners, and Reef users; (ii) data from remote sensing platforms and in-water sensors; and (iii) model predictions for factors such as wave and wind conditions, thermal stress,2161 and connectivity. Spatial analysis is then used to synthesise this information to develop flexible and targeted management actions. This process is part of an adaptive management approach that allows for continuous monitoring and adjustment of management strategies based on near real-time data and feedback, so that management strategies can be updated as new information becomes available. 

For example, the Crown-of-thorns Starfish Control Program has the capacity sufficient to manually cull starfish outbreaks on approximately 200 reefs per year. Surveillance and culling effort must be deployed to the right reefs at the right times to achieve optimal outbreak suppression and coral protection. The Reef Authority works with research partners and program contractors to prioritise reefs for crown-of-thorns starfish control on an annual basis. The annual reef prioritisation and work planning process is led by the Reef Authority in collaboration with government, research and industry partners. It draws on the latest field and model data to rank reefs according to a range of ecological and economic variables, including crown-of-thorns starfish risk, coral status, capacity to produce and spread starfish and coral larvae, and tourism value. The highest-ranking 200 to 250 reefs are selected as target reefs and then systematically actioned by teams of professional divers in accordance with the Integrated Pest Management framework developed for the control program.1024

New research demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach.187 Connectivity modelling and other tools developed for this program 2162 have potential wider applicability and could be used in combination with aerial and in-water survey data to better understand, predict and facilitate reef recovery following disturbances, such as cyclones and marine heatwaves.

Engagement: Continued productive working relationships between management partners (Traditional Owners and government agencies) and a diverse range of Reef stakeholders provide a collective understanding of the conditions (and trends in condition) of key values across the Region, the pressures affecting the Reef and shifting societal attitudes.  

Australian and Queensland government agencies, Traditional Owners, Reef industries and many other partners continue to make significant contributions to protecting and managing the Region. Agreements such as the Great Barrier Reef Intergovernmental Agreement 1300 form the basis of effective partnerships and collaboration between the Australian and Queensland Governments and associated agencies. Traditional Owner engagement has increased through the expanded Traditional Use of Marine Resources Agreements program, policy commitments to co-management, and strengthened communication between managers and Traditional Owners (Box 10.2). There are also continued, strong and growing connections between research and decision-making bodies. 

A group of people, consisting of scientists and Traditional Owners, looking at a midden.
Surveying the Freshwater Bay midden at Jiigurru (Lizard Island). © Sean Ulm 2022

Stakeholders and community members are involved at multiple levels. Advisory bodies, such as the Reef Authority’s Local Marine Advisory Committees, Indigenous Reef Advisory Committee, and Tourism Reef Advisory Committee provide advice to management about local and Reef-wide management. The Australian and Queensland governments also receive advice regarding the Reef 2050 Plan and related issues from a Reef 2050 Advisory Committee and an Independent Expert Panel. 

Stewardship programs, such as the Reef Guardians program, empower schools and local government councils within the Region to build their capacity to protect the Reef. Citizen science programs such as Eye on the Reef assist management and science through the provision, by tourism operators and others, of information on species of conservation concern or major events (such as coral bleaching). Monitoring information from these groups feeds into decision-support systems that guide management decisions to benefit the Region (Box 10.1). Community groups are also active in delivering local management actions, such as removing marine debris and responding to marine animal strandings.

Stewardship within the Region and continued on-ground initiatives to reduce risks and improve Reef and Catchment health are important and are making a collective difference. This continued approach will provide a strong foundation for maintaining a balance between protecting the Region’s values and supporting sustainable use.

Box 10.2

The Reef 2050 Traditional Owner Implementation Plan

Traditional Owners play a crucial role in caring for the Reef and have a deep understanding of its ecosystems. The ‘Heart of the Reef — A Call for Healing’ statement outlines the deep-rooted connections Traditional Owners have with the Reef and showcases both their concerns for and understanding of Reef ecosystems.2163

The Reef 2050 Traditional Owner Implementation Plan 1120 (Implementation Plan) forms part of the overarching Reef 2050 Plan and details Traditional Owner’s aspirations for the Reef. The Implementation Plan has been designed and led by Traditional Owners and has a key focus on the vision and outcome of ‘Healthy Reef, Healthy People’. The strategic framework underscores the importance of Indigenous perspectives, wisdom, and cultural connections to the Reef and of integrating traditional knowledge, and management practices into the overall strategy for the Reef’s conservation.

Actions are set out across six key work areas: climate change, land and coast, Sea Country, partnerships and capacity, knowledge systems and investment. These work areas are designed to nurture meaningful Traditional Owner inclusion, vision, and co-management and they focus on pathways to realising Traditional Owners’ aspirations. A key priority is to progress options around the establishment of a Reef-wide Sea Country Alliance to provide Traditional Owners a strong and representative voice for achieving their long-term aspirations for the Reef. 

In November 2023, a principles-based ‘Agreement to Partner’ was signed by the Reef 2050 Traditional Owner Steering Group, the Commonwealth Minister for the Environment and Water, and the Queensland Minister for the Environment and the Great Barrier Reef.2164 This is designed to give effect to the rights, interests, and aspirations of Traditional Owners for the Reef in delivering the Reef 2050 Traditional Owner Implementation Plan. 

Environmental regulation: Effective education and enforcement of current management tools, such as Acts, regulations, zoning plans, plans of management and permits, continue to be critical in reducing direct risks to the Region and supporting resilience of the Reef. The Reef Authority’s Policy and Planning Strategic Roadmap (2019) 1188 has been developed to ensure policies and plans are pro-active, contemporary and risk-based, which will help managers ensure people continue to use and access the Reef in a sustainable manner. The Australian Government’s Nature Positive Plan: Better for the Environment, Better for Business 2011 aims to strengthen and streamline the national environmental laws in response to an independent review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act). Australia’s commitment to emissions reductions is now legislated under the Climate Change Act 2022 (Cth). The Queensland Government has continued their significant fisheries reform process, including legislative changes to prohibit the take of hammerhead sharks and phase-out gillnet fishing in the Region by 2027, as well as implementing harvest strategies and improving data collection and independent data validation.

Significant investment in the Reef Joint Field Management Program has increased the capability of marine and island national park management and enabled delivery of field activities identified in the Reef 2050 Plan and Blueprint 2030. The program’s on-water capacity has been drastically increased, growing from an annual base funding commitment of $17 million in 2017–18 to more than $38 million in 2020–21.72 This funding will see more than a 60 per cent increase in staffing and an enhanced vessel fleet of more than 21 vessels. These resources will enable an increased focus on compliance, island and reef rehabilitation activities, incident response, collaboration with Traditional Owners to deliver field activities, and engagement with Reef and island users.

There has also been significant investment through the Queensland Reef Water Quality Program to support ongoing implementation of the Reef protection regulations and the Reef 2050 Water Quality Implementation Program.

A man looking out the window of a boat holding a camera with a long zoom lens.
Compliance staff in the field. © Commonwealth of Australia (Reef Authority) 2024 

Knowledge, integration and innovation: The independent review on the existing protection and management of the Region (Chapter 7) again rated managers’ understanding of the Region as the strongest element of the management cycle. This reflects a strong understanding of Reef values, national and international influences, and relevant government and non-government actors. Nevertheless, known and emerging gaps in knowledge (including around threats, their effects and suitable management approaches) present an ongoing challenge.

Following the Outlook Report 2019, key gaps in scientific and other knowledge of the Region were identified. The high-priority gaps needed to inform evidence-based decision-making and help improve management and protection strategies over the long-term were summarised into a report, Science and Knowledge Needs for Management.1386 This report sets out the Reef Authority’s priority information needs and is supported by an interactive tool on the online Reef Knowledge System (Box 10.3). The National Environmental Science Program continues to contribute to filling priority knowledge gaps. A recent project explored evaluation of recreational fishing behaviour, use, values and motivations that relate to compliance.

First Nations people have cared for Land and Sea Country for many generations. Integrating traditional knowledge and cultural science into decision-making will be important to inform future adaptive management of the Reef and Catchment. Critical to achieving this will be fostering greater participation of Traditional Owners in decision-making, increasing their access to the Reef, and enhancing their on-ground capacity and opportunities.

Integrating traditional knowledge and cultural science into decision‑making is important

Close-up photo of the traditional Owner observing a small fire in the foreground of the image.
Ngaro Traditional Owner preparing for a smoking ceremony. © Commonwealth of Australia (Reef Authority) 2024

Agile approaches are needed to protect key values and prevent human use patterns becoming unsustainable and hard to manage. Access to relevant information on biological and human dimensions will be key to supporting evolving policies and spatial planning. To do this, managers require up-to-date spatial and temporal information on how people use and value the Region, and the condition of associated local environmental, Indigenous, historic and social heritage values. Effective collaboration and partnerships with a network of providers will ensure best-available science continues to underpin management and allow evaluation of the effectiveness of actions.

Developing ways to understand and respond to the effects of cumulative impacts remains paramount. While implementation of the Reef-wide Cumulative Impact Management Policy (released in 2018) 2149 is underway, cumulative impact management of multiple uses in and adjacent to the Region remains a challenge.11,1982  Escalating climate change pressures have heightened the importance of implementing this policy and progressing contemporary spatial planning in the Region and Catchment.

Box 10.3

Bringing knowledge together for Reef management

A key part of the Reef 2050 Integrated Monitoring and Reporting Program (RIMReP) is the Reef Knowledge System website, which seeks to provide a knowledge system for resilience-based management of the Reef and its Catchment. 

A prototype of the Reef Knowledge System was published in 2020 and the first edition of the website was released in 2022. The content strategy for the system is to curate RIMReP data and information into a streamlined digital space that helps Reef managers navigate to the information they need to make evidence-based decisions. The program achieves this by working with multiple levels of government, research institutions, and Traditional Owners. The system provides a window into the Great Barrier Reef’s complex social and natural ecosystem, through a public-facing website and additional access for managers.

Program development focuses on three knowledge system components:

  • Collecting and integrating data: For the first time, a centralised location will provide access to information from monitoring and modelling of the Reef’s biophysical, social, economic, Indigenous and heritage values, as well as the drivers and pressures on those values.
  • Improving data access: Enabling access to data through the knowledge system requires meeting sufficient standards for data management, collection and sharing.
  • Visualising data: The knowledge system will allow users to access consolidated and integrated information, becoming a ‘first stop shop’ for Reef managers.

RIMReP and its Reef Knowledge System aim to connect information from across domains (such as the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program and Crown-of-thorns Starfish Control Innovation Program 2169), enabling more-informed strategic and operational decision making. The Reef Knowledge System also links users to partner systems and other useful Reef information (for example, eReefs and Paddock to Reef). The Reef Knowledge System will continue to evolve in response to user needs and the increasing availability of data and new science and technologies. It will further integrate a wide variety of data, information, and knowledge to help inform and guide management decisions in a rapidly changing environment.

Implementing a Reef-wide integrated monitoring and reporting program directly linked to an outcomes-based management framework will underpin adaptive management. The Reef 2050 Integrated Monitoring and Reporting Program (RIMReP) aims to address integrated information needs for future management of the Reef (Box 10.3).

Approaches must be agile and constantly evolving as threats are multiple, cumulative and intensifying

Given the increasing frequency of acute and chronic stressors, timely information on the health of key indicators (species, processes, and human dimension values) and their trajectories over time and space is critical. Indicators for ecosystem health and community wellbeing are being developed through RIMReP to measure condition (and trend in condition) of values. Good alignment between what is measured, how it relates to relevant thresholds, and how it meets the desired outcomes for the Region’s values provides the most powerful insight. For example, a holistic metric of seagrass resilience has been developed based on measurable biological characteristics that exemplify seagrass resistance to pressures and essential mechanisms for recovery (Section 8.3.2).2063 A similar metric for coral that expands on conventional measures, such as coral cover, is under development.2055,2056

It is still essential to investigate intervention strategies and technologies that are scalable and effective at improving the resilience of Reef habitats. For example, the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program is investigating and developing coral reef intervention techniques that can be feasibly applied at sufficient scale to have a positive effect on Reef condition. This will require a combination of discovery research and applied field testing. Information on how intervention activities can be effective at scale, while minimising harm, is important for researchers, managers, and the community. Given the connection to, and value of, the Region for Traditional Owners and the community, those undertaking intervention activities must understand and consider social attitudes.

Investment in innovative field-based and desktop technologies is needed to support improvements in monitoring and management. Emerging technologies (Section 6.2.3) are increasingly enabling managers to monitor remote and inaccessible parts of the Region. Increasing use of drones, night vision and vessel tracking will increase surveillance and enforcement of Reef rules. Drones continue to provide increased and cheaper monitoring capability and aerial mapping. Environmental DNA is being explored as a means of quantifying species presence and diversity more quickly and affordably than conventional methods. Innovation by individuals and within businesses can broadly support decarbonisation of the Australian economy and can help drive positive actions by setting examples for others. For example, the actions in the Reef Authority’s Sustainability Strategy include a detailed roadmap to reducing emissions by the agency to net zero by 2030.2165,2166 Similarly, the Queensland Department of Environment, Science and Innovation’s emissions reduction efforts link to various Queensland strategies and plans.85,2167,2168

References
  • 11. Baker, I., Peterson, A., Tobin, L., Toki, B. and Visser, J. 2024, Independent assessment of management effectiveness for the Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report 2024, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 72. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and Queensland Government 2023, Reef Joint Field Management Program: Annual Report Summary 2022-23, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 85. Department of Environment and Science 2020, Queensland’s Protected Area Strategy 2020 – 2030: Protecting our world-class natural and cultural values, Queensland Government, Brisbane.
  • 187. Matthews, S.A., Williamson, D.H., Beeden, R., Emslie, M.J., Abom, R.T.M., et al. 2024, Protecting Great Barrier Reef resilience through effective management of crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks, PLoS One 19(4): e0298073.
  • 1024. Westcott, D.A., Fletcher, C.S., Gladish, D.W., MacDonald, S. and Condie, S. 2021, Integrated pest management crown-of-thorns starfish control program on the Great Barrier Reef: current performance and future potential. Report to the National Environmental Science Program, Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns.
  • 1120. The Reef 2050 Traditional Owner Steering Group 2022, Reef 2050 Traditional Owner Implementation Plan, Queensland Government, Brisbane.
  • 1188. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2024, Policy and Planning Strategic Roadmap, <https://www2.gbrmpa.gov.au/about-us/policy-and-planning-roadmap>.
  • 1300. Commonwealth of Australia and State of Queensland 2015, Great Barrier Reef Intergovernmental Agreement, Commonwealth of Australia and State of Queensland, Canberra and Brisbane.
  • 1386. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2021, Science and knowledge needs for management, GBRMPA, Townsville.
  • 1883. Department of Environment and Science 2018, Reef 2050 Water Quality Improvement Plan 2017-2022, Queensland Government, Brisbane.
  • 1982. Samuel, G. 2020, Independent review of the EPBC Act – final report, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment.
  • 1984. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2024, Great Barrier Reef blueprint for climate resilience and adaptation, Reef Authority, Townsville.
  • 2011. Department of Climate Change Energy the Environment and Water 2022, Nature Positive Plan: better for the environment, better for business, Canberra.
  • 2055. Gonzalez-Rivero, M., Thompson, A., Johns, K., Ortiz, J., Kim, S., et al. 2023, Indicator Framework for the evaluation of the condition of coral reef habitats in the Great Barrier Reef: Methodological Documentation. Report prepared for the Great Barrier Reef Foundation, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville.
  • 2056. Gonzalez-Rivero, M., Thompson, A., Johns, K., Ortiz, J., Kim, S., et al. 2023, Indicator Framework for the evaluation of the condition of coral reef habitats in the Great Barrier Reef: Introduction. Report prepared for the Great Barrier Reef Foundation, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville.
  • 2063. Udy, J., Waycott, M., Carter, A., Collier, C., Kilminster, K., et al. Monitoring seagrass within the Reef 2050 Integrated Monitoring and Reporting Program: final report of the seagrass expert group 8 June 2018, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 2149. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2018, Cumulative impact management policy, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 2160. McLeod, E., Shaver, E.C., Beger, M., Koss, J. and Grimsditch, G. 2021, Using resilience assessments to inform the management and conservation of coral reef ecosystems, Journal of Environmental Management 277: 111384.
  • 2161. Holbrook, N.J., Sen Gupta, A., Oliver, E.C., Hobday, A.J., Benthuysen, J.A., et al. 2020, Keeping pace with marine heatwaves, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 1(9): 482-493.
  • 2162. Matthews, S. 2019, Modelling tools to support the management of crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster cf.solaris) on Australia's Great Barrier Reef, PhD, James Cook University.
  • 2163. Great Barrier Reef Traditional Custodians 2021, Heart of the Reef — A Call for Healing , <https://www.barrierreef.org/news/healing-country/heart-of-the-reef-a-call-for-healing>.
  • 2164. Commonwealth Minister for the Environment and Water, the Honourable Tanya Plibersek MP, Queensland Minister for the Environment and Great Barrier Reef, Minister for Science and Minister for Multicultural Affairs, the Honourable Leanne Linard MP and Reef 2050 Traditional Owner Steering Group 2023, Reef 2050 Traditional Owner Implementation Plan - Agreement to Partner, entered into on 15 November 2023.
  • 2165. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Reef Authority roadmap to net zero by 2030, <https://www2.gbrmpa.gov.au/about-us/reef-authority-roadmap-net-zero-2030>.
  • 2166. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2024, Sustainability Strategy 2024-2027, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 2167. State of Queensland 2022, Queensland’s zero emission vehicle strategy 2022–2032, Department of Transport and Main Roads., Brisbane.
  • 2168. Department of Environment Science and Innovation, Net zero emissions by 2030, <https://www.des.qld.gov.au/our-department/net-zero>.
  • 2169. Great Barrier Reef Foundation 2024, COTS Control Innovation Program, <https://barrierreef.org/cots-control-innovation-program>.