8.3.4 Coral trout

Coral trout belong to the genus Plectropomus and are one of the largest and most conspicuous fishes on coral reefs of the Indo-Pacific. They are key reef predators that play an important role in the transfer of energy through the food chain and influence the composition of fish assemblages through top-down control via predation.1331,2077 Coral trout are also highly prized food fishes that are targeted by commercial, recreational, artisanal and subsistence fisheries throughout their geographic ranges.2078,2079 Coral trout is one of the major components of the line fishery catch in the Reef. The genus Plectropomus has 8 species, of which 6 occur in the Region.2080 

Common coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus) is the most abundant and widespread coral trout species across most of the Region.2081 Two closely related species, the spotted (bar-cheek) coral trout (Plectropomus maculatus), and the black-saddled (footballer/blue-spot) coral trout (Plectropomus laevis) are common on inner-shelf and outer-shelf reefs, respectively.2081,2082 Common coral trout typically have constrained home ranges but can move considerable distances within and sometimes among reefs, particularly when transiting to and from spawning aggregation sites.2083,2084,2085

Common coral trout are protogynous hermaphrodites that transition from female to male throughout their development.2078 Females reach sexual maturity at 30 to 37 centimetres total length and 2 to 3 years of age.2086 The size and age of transition from female to male is variable but is likely to be influenced by a range of factors including population size structure, behavioural processes, and fishing intensity.2086 In the Region, peak spawning periods extend over several days around new moons spanning the Australian summer.2087 However, recent evidence also shows that the Reef’s coral trout can spawn and produce viable offspring throughout the year.1357 Hybridisation among several coral trout species is known to occur, including between common coral trout and spotted coral trout.2088,2089

Coral trout closely associate with coral reef habitat. Post-settlement juvenile coral trout are commonly found in patchy reef habitats with interspersed live coral colonies that provide them with shelter.2090 Adult coral trout often reside under tabular corals and within reef crevices that provide shade, shelter and concealment from which they can ambush prey.2091 Coral trout population dynamics and resilience can be strongly influenced by changes in coral cover, reef habitat complexity and prey abundance following disturbance events.2091,2092,2093 Therefore, coral loss can increase the risk of overfishing of coral trout stocks due to sudden productivity declines.2094 For example, on fringing reefs in the Keppel Islands group in the southern region, coral trout abundance was significantly reduced, and tracked the trajectory of declines in coral cover and prey fish abundance, following flood plume disturbances between 2009 and 2013.2092

A recent study has shown that physiological parameters used to assess the health of coral trout were unrelated to coral cover at sites where individual fish were captured. These results suggest that adult common coral trout may be resilient to declines in coral cover, at least over periods of 2 to 5 years following acute coral loss caused by climate-induced mass coral bleaching.2095 Given the age at first breeding for coral trout is 2 to 3 years and that adult biomass is dominated by older age classes, the impacts of reduced coral cover on adult biomass are unlikely to manifest for at least 5 years.2094 Additionally, past stock assessments for coral trout have not found any clear association between bleaching events and coral trout catchability. However, a previous stock assessment observed that coral loss caused by cyclones correlated with lower catchability of coral trout over the following years.2096 A lack of relationship between coral cover and the health of individual adult coral trout likely represents the coral trout’s increased access to prey resources and reduced investment in key energetic process, such as growth. These factors may increase the resilience of coral trout to habitat degradation in the short-term.2095

Pressures such as increases in sea temperature can directly affect fish physiology and behaviour, which can ultimately undermine the capacity of coral trout populations to acclimatise or adapt to changes in environmental conditions.2097 Loss of coral and habitat degradation are also factors influencing coral trout biology and ecology.

A coral trout swimming above a coral reef. The coral trout has its mouth open and dorsal fin flared.
Coral trout benefit from the structure provided by coral reefs. © Matt Curnock 2022

Management 

Coral trout are the primary targets of the Queensland Reef Line Fishery.1270 The fishery makes no distinction between coral trout species, and they are collectively marketed as coral trout, but common coral trout are the primary target species.2098 Coral trout comprise approximately 35 to 55 per cent of the commercial catch, 20 to 25 per cent of the charter catch and 15 to 20 per cent of the recreational catch of demersal reef fish from the Reef.2099 

Coral trout are managed as a single stock using a range of fishery controls, including individual transferable quotas (ITQs) and a total allowable commercial catch (TACC) for the commercial sector, as well as a minimum length limit and a recreational in-possession (bag) limit.2100 Annual coral trout harvest peaked at approximately 2000 tonnes in the early 2000s before the introduction of ITQs and a TACC of 1350 tonnes in 2004 and a further reduction to 1280 tonnes in 2005 (Figure 8.6).1270 In 2022, a common coral trout stock assessment identified that total retained coral trout catch averaged 1002 tonnes between 2017 and 2021. This included 812 tonnes by the commercial sector, 68 tonnes by the charter sector, 111 tonnes by the recreational sector and 11 tonnes by First Nations (Traditional Owner) fishers.1270

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Plan 2003 has generated significant benefits for coral trout stocks and other reef-associated species.2101 Coral trout are more abundant, larger, older, and more fecund on Marine National Park Zone (no-take reserve) reefs than on reefs that have remained open to fishing.58,2102 Furthermore, no-take reserves also export coral trout larvae and deliver recruitment subsidies to fished reefs, contributing to population replenishment and fishery sustainability across the Region.2102,2103 The existing management regime that mixes Marine Park no-take zones and catch quotas is robust to regional variation in ecological dynamics, overfishing and climatic change.656

The Queensland Reef Line Fishery is also subject to short seasonal closures during summer new moons that apply to both commercial and recreational sectors. The closures are based on the presumption of seasonal and lunar spawning of the common coral trout.1270 However, a recent study has shown that year-round spawning activity generates distinct recruitment cohorts that span several weeks to months in the Region. In some instances, peak spawning had little or no alignment with existing seasonal fisheries closures around the new moon.1357 Given the recent indication of variability and uncertainty in peak spawning times,1357 the coral trout fishery may further benefit from additional and longer seasonal closures, or alternative fisheries management strategies, to maximise the recruitment contribution from periods of greatest reproductive success.2088 

Figure 8.6
Australian east coast stock assessment biomass estimate, 1953 to 2022

The chart presents the biomass ratio of common coral trout and key management actions from 1953 to 2022. The ratio is relative to a value of 1 in 1953. Data used in the stock assessment include 53 years of commercial catch data, 37,061 fish aged, 41,472 commercially caught fish measured, 6778 recreational catches measured, 8242 fish measured in underwater visual surveys and 26,883 fish observed in underwater visual surveys. MLS: minimum legal size. ITQs: individual transferable quotas. TACC: total allowable commercial catch. Source: Modified from Queensland Department of Fisheries (2022), original plot generated 08 March 2022.2104

This is a line graph showing ‘Spawning biomass ratio’ on the y-axis and ‘Financial year’ on the x-axis (ranging from 1950 to 2020). There are coloured dots along a black line that relate to key management actions.

Evidence for recovery or decline

The latest stock assessment modelling for coral trout indicated that between 1953 and 2011 biomass declined to 46 per cent relative to unfished spawning stock biomass. Spawning stock biomass has been steadily increasing since 2012. In 2022, the stock level was estimated to be at 60 per cent unfished biomass.1270 Coral trout stock assessment modelling draws upon Reef fishery catch and effort data and fishery-independent underwater visual census data. The use of fishery-independent data is fundamental to accounting for differences in coral trout abundance and size between reefs that are open and closed to fishing within the Marine Park.1270 

Fisheries controls and the zoning plan have helped coral trout populations

It is important to note that these modelling results do not take into consideration environmental factors known to affect stock levels, and they incorporate limited information on recreational catches. Nevertheless, the stock assessment provides the best evidence that fishery controls on catch and effort, combined with Marine Park zoning and compliance, have led to an increase in coral trout population size and enhanced the sustainability of reef line fishery catches. There is growing concern about the impacts of climate change on coral trout populations.1270 While coral cover in the Region has recovered recently to record highs in some reefs,161 continuing increases in cumulative disturbances, such as cyclones and increased sea temperatures, can result in significant coral loss. Habitat degradation may increase the vulnerability of common coral trout to exploitation and undermine fisheries sustainability.58,1646,2105

References
  • 58. Emslie, M.J., Bray, P., Cheal, A.J., Johns, K.A., Osborne, K., et al. 2020, Decades of monitoring have informed the stewardship and ecological understanding of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, Biological Conservation 252: 108854.
  • 656. Brown, C.J., Mellin, C., Edgar, G.J., Campbell, M.D. and Stuart‐Smith, R.D. 2021, Direct and indirect effects of heatwaves on a coral reef fishery, Global Change Biology 27(6): 1214-1225.
  • 1646. Pratchett, M.S., Cameron, D.S., Donelson, J., Evans, L., Frisch, A.J., et al. 2017, Effects of climate change on coral grouper (Plectropomus spp.) and possible adaptation options, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 27(2): 297-316.
  • 1270. Fox, A.R., Campbell, A.B. and Sieth, J.D. 2022, Stock assessment of Queensland east coast common coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus), Australia, with data to December 2021, State of Queensland, Brisbane.
  • 1331. Boaden, A.E. and Kingsford, M.J. 2015, Predators drive community structure in coral reef fish assemblages, Ecosphere 6(4): 1-33.
  • 1357. Harrison, H.B., Drane, L., Berumen, M.L., Cresswell, B.J., Evans, R.D., et al. 2023, Ageing of juvenile coral grouper (Plectropomus maculatus) reveals year-round spawning and recruitment: implications for seasonal closures, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 290(2001): 20230584.
  • 2077. Graham, N.A.J., Evans, R.D. and Russ, G.R. 2003, The effects of marine reserve protection on the trophic relationships of reef fishes on the Great Barrier Reef, Environmental Conservation 30(2): 200-208.
  • 2078. Frisch, A.J., Cameron, D.S., Pratchett, M.S., Williamson, D.H., Williams, A.J., et al. 2016, Key aspects of the biology, fisheries and management of Coral grouper, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 26(3): 303-325.
  • 2079. Sadovy de Mitcheson, Y., Craig, M.T., Bertoncini, A.A., Carpenter, K.E., Cheung, W.W.L., et al. 2013, Fishing groupers towards extinction: a global assessment of threats and extinction risks in a billion dollar fishery, Fish and Fisheries 14(2): 119-136.
  • 2080. Froese, R. and Pauly, D. 2023, FishBase, International Centre for Living Aquatic Resources Management, <www.fishbase.org>.
  • 2081. Emslie, M.J., Cheal, A.J. and Logan, M. 2017, The distribution and abundance of reef-associated predatory fishes on the Great Barrier Reef, Coral Reefs 36(3): 829-846.
  • 2082. Newman, S.J., Williams, D.M. and Russ, G.R. 1997, Patterns of zonation of assemblages of the Lutjanidae, Lethrinidae and Serranidae (Epinephelinae) within and among mid-shelf and outer-shelf reefs in the central Great Barrier Reef, Marine and Freshwater Research 48(2): 119-128.
  • 2083. Zeller, D.C. 1997, Home range and activity patterns of the coral trout Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae), Marine Ecology Progress Series 154: 65-77.
  • 2084. Davies, C.R. 2000, Inter-reef movement of the common coral trout, Plectropomus leopardus, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, Queensland.
  • 2085. Bunt, C.M. and Kingsford, M.J. 2014, Movement, habitat utilization and behaviour of coral trout Plectropomus leopardus during and after the reproductive period on the southern Great Barrier Reef, Marine Ecology Progress Series 496: 33-45.
  • 2086. Ferreira, B.P. 1995, Reproduction of the Common Coral Trout Plectropomus Leopardus (Serranidae: Epinephelinae) from the central and northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Bulletin of Marine Science 56(2): 653-669.
  • 2087. Samoilys, M.A. 1997, Periodicity of spawning aggregations of coral trout Plectropomus leopardus (Pisces: Serranidae) on the northern Great Barrier Reef, Marine Ecology Progress Series 160: 149-159.
  • 2088. Harrison, H.B., Berumen, M.L., Saenz-Agudelo, P., Salas, E., Williamson, D.H., et al. 2017, Widespread hybridization and bidirectional introgression in sympatric species of coral reef fish, Molecular Ecology 26(20): 5692-5704.
  • 2089. Frisch, A. and Van Herwerden, L. 2006, Field and experimental studies of hybridization between coral trouts, Plectropomus leopardus and Plectropomus maculatus (Serranidae), on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Journal of Fish Biology 68(4): 1013-1025.
  • 2090. Wen, C.K.C., Pratchett, M.S., Almany, G.R. and Jones, G.P. 2013, Role of prey availability in microhabitat preferences of juvenile coral trout (Plectropomus: Serranidae), Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 443: 39-45.
  • 2091. Kerry, J.T. and Bellwood, D.R. 2015, Do tabular corals constitute keystone structures for fishes on coral reefs? Coral Reefs 34(1): 41-50.
  • 2092. Williamson, D.H., Ceccarelli, D.M., Evans, R.D., Jones, G.P. and Russ, G.R. 2014, Habitat dynamics, marine reserve status, and the decline and recovery of coral reef fish communities, Ecology and Evolution 4(4): 337-354.
  • 2093. Emslie, M.J., Logan, M., Williamson, D.H., Ayling, A.M., MacNeil, M.A., et al. 2015, Expectations and outcomes of reserve network performance following re-zoning of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Current Biology 25(8): 983-992.
  • 2094. Brown, C.J., Taylor, W., Wabnitz, C.C.C. and Connolly, R.M. 2020, Dependency of Queensland and the Great Barrier Reef's tropical fisheries on reef-associated fish, Scientific Reports 10(1): 17801.
  • 2095. Pratchett, M.S., Caballes, C.F., Hobbs, J.P.A., Di Battista, J.D., Bergseth, B., et al. 2023, Variation in the physiological condition of common Coral Trout (Plectropomus leopardus) unrelated to coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Fishes 8(10): 497.
  • 2096. Leigh, G. M., Campbell, A. B., Lunow, C. P., O’Neill, M. F. 2014, Stock assessment of the Queensland east coast common coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus) fishery, Queensland Government, Brisbane.
  • 2097. Johansen, J.L., Pratchett, M.S., Messmer, V., Coker, D.J., Tobin, A.J., et al. 2015, Large predatory coral trout species unlikely to meet increasing energetic demands in a warming ocean, Scientific Reports 5(1): 13830.
  • 2098. Heupel, M.R., Williams, A.J., Welch, D.J., Davies, C.R., Adams, S., et al. 2010, Demography of a large exploited grouper, Plectropomus laevis: implications for fisheries management, Marine and Freshwater Research 61(2): 184-195.
  • 2099. Mapstone, B.D., Davies, C.R., Little, L.R., Punt, A.E., Smith, A., et al. 2004, The effects of line fishing on the Great Barrier Reef and evaluations of alternative potential management strategies, CRC Reef Research Centre Ltd, Townsville.
  • 2100. State of Queensland 2020, Reef line fishery harvest strategy: 2020–2025 , State of Queensland, Brisbane.
  • 2101. McCook, L.J., Ayling, T., Cappo, M., Choat, J.H., Evans, R.D., et al. 2010, Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: A globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(43): 18278-18285.
  • 2102. Williamson, D.H., Harrison, H.B., Almany, G.R., Berumen, M.L., Bode, M., et al. 2016, Large-scale, multidirectional larval connectivity among coral reef fish populations in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Molecular Ecology 25(24): 6039-6054.
  • 2103. Harrison, H.B., Williamson, D.H., Evans, R.D., Almany, G.R., Thorrold, S.R., et al. 2012, Larval export from marine reserves and the recruitment benefit for fish and fisheries, Current Biology 22(11): 1023-1028.
  • 2104. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries 2022, Common coral trout stock assessment, <https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/business-priorities/fisheries/monitoring-research/data/stock-assessment-program/common-coral-trout-stock>.
  • 2105. Pratchett, M. S., Clark, T. D., Scott, M., Hoey, A. S., Leigh, G. M., Emslie, M. J. 2022, Effects of climate change and habitat degradation on coral trout (Plectropomus spp.), Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Townsville.