7.3.6 Research activities

This evaluation of effectiveness of management focuses on the direct management of research activities that occur within the Region. Alignment of research into decision-making and management agency interactions with research providers are also considered, but to a lesser extent. 

Research conducted on the Reef is a source of ongoing knowledge upon which to base future management policies and decisions. Most research activities occur at the four major research stations on Lizard, Orpheus, One Tree and Heron islands. 

Researchers who undertake research in the Region, such as collection of specimens, in situ experiments and installation of research equipment, require permits and licences from managing agencies. The Reef Authority, Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service and Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries have lead roles in managing research activities. These activities are managed through zoning plans, legislation, policy and the marine parks permissions system. Joint accreditation of research institutions by the Reef Authority and Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service enables low-risk research to occur in some locations without the need for specific permits.5 

The role of citizen science has increased in intensity over this period of review. Citizen science programs are increasingly aiming to support decision-making by Reef managers. Key programs to help facilitate this include Eye on the Reef and The Great Reef Census. One notable use of data from citizen science programs is in the Crown-of-thorns Starfish Control Program which uses data to inform culling efforts.

Close-up photograph of a cloud-brightening machine that is directed towards the sea and expulsing a small cloud of water vapour, with a view on the sea, horizon, and sun.
An initial trial of prototype cloud brightening equipment, near Broadhurst Reef. © Commonwealth of Australia (Reef Authority) 2021, photographer: Rohana Rogan-Darvill

Most impacts associated with research are understood and are considered low risk and well managed. The Reef Authority, in partnership with the Queensland Department of Environment, Science and Innovation, has been actively adapting the planning system for research in response to the emerging field of intervention and adaptation research. 

In 2020, the managing agencies published a policy on Great Barrier Reef interventions (Box 7.3). This is a vital first step in planning for and managing research efforts into novel intervention and adaptation approaches, such as those being conducted by the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program. These interventions vary in their associated risk. In 2023, research on interventions was largely focused on initial small-scale trials with low complexity. The objective of these programs is to develop a suite of interventions that will build the resilience of the Reef. To accomplish this goal, the interventions will grow in size and complexity with early efforts to manage risk effectively becoming increasingly important. While key biophysical information gaps remain in relation to feasibility, potential impacts and anticipated future benefits of some of these interventions, the policy represents a positive step toward managing research efforts in the face of future uncertainty. The policy is complemented by guidelines that address the emergence of research into interventions on the Reef.

Box 7.3

Managing rehabilitation and adaptation interventions in the Region

Mitigating human-induced climate change through effective global emissions reduction is the most urgent and critical need for the Reef’s future, but there is a growing need for active and targeted interventions to support the resilience of the Reef’s ecosystems in the face of current and future threats.2,1387,1397 Existing management and interventions, such as Marine Park zoning, permissions system, compliance, crown-of-thorns starfish control, and fisheries and catchment management, remain critical to supporting the health of the Reef but these alone may no longer be sufficient.1387 

In 2020, the Reef Authority and Queensland Department of Environment, Science and Innovation implemented the Policy on Great Barrier Reef Interventions (Intervention Policy). This policy supports the research and development of novel innovations that could directly support ecosystem recovery to build resilience and achieve conservation benefits. The Intervention Policy seeks to provide adaptive, robust and enabling decision-making guidance for the development, testing and implementation of a suite of interventions. The methods proposed for the Reef vary in their associated ecosystem, social, cultural and economic risks. Some of the interventions are novel within the marine environment and are associated with varying degrees of scientific uncertainty. To mitigate the risks, small-scale in situ pilot trials are encouraged to understand which methods might be feasible, cost-effective at large scale and lead to the greatest conservation benefits.  

Interventions can pose a complex decision-making landscape where Reef managers must consider current risks associated with applied research and development trials, the potential conservation benefits for the future, and the risks of inaction. Decisions must include assessment balancing the enabling of innovation while minimising risks from failures in this emerging area of science, technology and governance. 

In some cases, independent groups can support intervention research programs to identify and assess risks, such as the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program’s Intervention Risk Review Group. This is an independent, interdisciplinary expert group established to consider matters related to, and provide guidance and advice on, the assessment and management of intervention risk for the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program activities.

Research is generally not considered to have a large or detrimental impact on the Reef ecosystem. However, there is a lack of understanding regarding the cumulative impacts of research activities. Specifically, there is limited understanding of cumulative impacts in relation to extractive research efforts. There is the potential for risk of lasting harm from the cumulative impact of research on reefs surrounding the four major research stations where most research takes place. While recognising the knowledge gap, some researchers suggest that damage to these reefs is likely to be outweighed by benefits from the outcomes of the research.

A knowledge gap exists around cumulative impacts of research

Permitting for research in the Marine Park has also seen some notable improvements since 2019. Through streamlining permits and improvements to the Reef Management System and Permits Online system researchers and education programs can now submit their permit activity reports (such as take of specimens, equipment installation) through an online database that is searchable by the Reef Authority. Uncertainty remains about the adequacy of current Marine Park permission systems in keeping pace with novel intervention and adaptation approaches. Additionally, there is a need for greater baseline information to inform permitting and research decisions, including on cumulative impacts.

Underwater photograph of a SCUBA diver swimming above a seabed dominated by coral rubble, marked with pickets, while holding a pole with two mounted GoPro’s. Two additional divers can be seen in the background, one idling at the surface, and the other one hidden behind the diver’s fins, merely visible by his tank and underwater bubbles.
Stereo photogrammetry survey by reef tourism industry collaborating with RRAP scientists at Moore Reef. © Matt Curnock. 2023

Applied research and monitoring is key to assessing and advising on the condition (and trend in condition) of the values and threats arising from broader environmental and anthropogenic stressors. Numerous science strategies, research partnerships and funding streams are in place to support and influence research priorities so that outcomes can be applied to and integrated into management. While the Reef Authority and Queensland government agencies are not primarily research organisations, they have sound working relationships with the scientific community. Examples include memorandums of understanding with universities and relationships with science organisations, such as CSIRO and the Australian Institute of Marine Science, and museums, such as the Australian Museum which operates the Lizard Island Research Station. These relationships allow managing agencies to help focus research on key management issues for the Region and to better distribute findings via cross-organisation training and meetings. Where possible, these relationships also help facilitate review of research management practices to minimise any adverse impacts of research activities. The development of the Data Management System for the Reef 2050 Monitoring and Reporting Program is intended to harvest data from multiple sources to form a common ‘data lake’ with managed access. This system is designed to facilitate easier access for managers to Reef research outputs with a focus on monitoring and modelling.

References
  • 2. Australian Government and Queensland Government 2023, Reef 2050 Long-Term Sustainability Plan 2021-2025, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra.
  • 5. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2019, Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report 2019, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 1387. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2017, Great Barrier Reef blueprint for resilience, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 1397. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2020, Policy on Great Barrier Reef interventions (Document no. 100513), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.