6.5.2 Vulnerability of the ecosystem to land-based runoff

It has been long recognised that, due to changes in land use following European settlement, the Region’s values are threatened by poor water quality resulting from increased concentrations of suspended sediment, nutrients, pesticides and other pollutants (Section 6.5.1).42 The risk of specific pollutants — including the severity and duration of exposure, and the species, habitats and ecological processes affected — varies across the Region.1880 Risk from pollutants is influenced by the volume and timing of seasonal rainfall and subsequent runoff events, which are determined by the highly variable monsoonal climate (Box 6.1) and extreme weather events, such as cyclones and hydrodynamic factors, including tidal regimes and currents.693 

Pollutants in land-based runoff can affect ecosystem resilience by reducing biodiversity and destabilising ecosystem functions and services.1840,1881 Inshore areas of the Reef experience the greatest impacts, whereas mid-shelf and outer reefs are less frequently affected due to their distance from river mouths and the primarily northward dispersion of most river plumes.528 However, after large rainfall events and under atypical hydrodynamic conditions, flood plumes can reach these more distant areas,586,919,1882  as evidenced by the Burdekin River floods in 2019.771 

Understanding the exposure of the Region’s ecosystems to pollutants in land-based runoff is important for identifying the most vulnerable areas and setting specific targets for reduction of pollutants entering the coastal and inshore areas 1883 (Section 6.5.1). Areas adjacent to the Wet Tropics, Burdekin and Mackay Whitsunday regions are of particular concern given their high loads of dissolved inorganic nutrients, suspended sediments and pesticides, respectively.693 Inshore ecosystems such as seagrass meadows and coral reefs are the most susceptible to impacts due to their proximity to pollution sources. Different pollutants can combine to produce compounding effects. For example, both elevated levels of suspended sediment in the water column, and the proliferation of phytoplankton caused by increased dissolved nutrients, reduce the available light for benthic organisms, such as corals and seagrasses.175,1840

Land-based runoff makes inshore marine ecosystems more vulnerable to disturbances

Inshore ecosystems generally exhibit a capacity for recovery in the absence of acute events, such as cyclones and large river discharge,175,573 though this capacity can be reduced by chronic exposure to other stressors.1880,1884 For example, in 2019 the Burdekin floods caused significant decline in seagrass condition, but by 2022 in the absence of major weather events, the condition of seagrass had started to recover, likely driven by the presence of large seed banks.145 Chronic impacts of poor water quality caused by land-based runoff can lower the resilience of ecosystems making them vulnerable to future disturbances.573,1405 The frequency of exposure to river plumes is negatively associated with the ability of corals 573,1405 and seagrasses 576 to recover after disturbance.

Nutrients

Excess nutrients from land-based runoff can cause significant deleterious impacts on the Reef’s ecosystems. Nutrients are chemical elements or compounds that are essential to life but, when present in excessive amounts, can cause negative ecological consequences.132,571,1840 Most discharge of nutrients from rivers to the Region occurs in the summer wet season, from December to April. Microbial mineralisation and mobilisation of particulate and organic forms are also important sources of bioavailable nutrients.595 

Excess nutrients are associated with increased biomass of phytoplankton and zooplankton primarily in the inshore area.703 Phytoplankton biomass responds positively to nutrient availability, leading to phytoplankton blooms following discharge of nutrient-rich flood waters.1885 The impact of elevated phytoplankton on coral reefs and seagrass meadows is mostly via reduction of water clarity and consequently light availability for the photosynthesis of corals and seagrasses.132,276

A photo of an intertidal flat exposed at low tide with small rocks covered in green algae, and Magnetic Island in the distance
Nutrients promote growth of macroalgae in inshore areas, Pallarenda. © Dieter Tracey 2013

Elevated nutrient levels, particularly dissolved inorganic nitrogen, have been associated with a lowering of thermal bleaching threshold in corals in the Region.276,733,1886 Nutrients can also affect the coral microbiome, resulting in microbial imbalance (dysbiosis) and coral disease. Although nutrient enrichment can be broadly associated with coral disease, relationships with specific nutrient forms remains unclear.731 On inshore reefs, the influx of land-based nutrients is associated with high cover of macroalgae. Once established, macroalgae are often highly persistent, as density-dependent feedback loops reinforce their competitive advantage relative to that of corals.185 As a result, high macroalgal cover often hinders the recovery of coral communities after acute disturbances, such as heat stress or cyclones.

Elevated nutrient levels affect coral health and susceptibility to bleaching

Seagrasses can also be indirectly affected by nutrients. While elevated nutrients can enhance seagrass growth,1887 they also promote the growth of phytoplankton, macroalgae, and epiphytic algae, which results in reduced light attenuation for seagrass leaves.1818 Epiphytes and macroalgae can compete with and block light reaching seagrass leaves, thereby compounding environmental stress.145 In the inshore seagrass monitoring sites, decreasing and low epiphyte cover on seagrass leaves across coastal habitats, accompanied by continued low macroalgae abundance across all habitats, has contributed to the recovery of seagrass meadows in the Region.145

Nutrient enrichment has also been often cited as a factor driving outbreaks of crown-of-thorns starfish 1010 (Section 3.6.2). Nutrients from land-based runoff during heavy river discharge events, which sometimes coincide with the pelagic phase of developing larvae, can result in phytoplankton blooms that increase the amount of food available for crown-of-thorns starfish larvae.735 The observed sensitivity of crown-of-thorns starfish larvae to low-salinity waters associated with flood plumes 768 may partially explain why crown-of-thorns starfish are less common on inshore reefs. However, this sensitivity does not preclude a role for increased planktonic productivity linked to land-based runoff having positive impacts on larval survival and development.1021 Although the role of nutrient enrichment in crown-of-thorns starfish outbreak dynamics remains unresolved,735,1888 recent findings suggest only a weak link between the influx of nutrients from land-based runoff and the modelled response of phytoplankton productivity in the primary initiation zone of crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks in mid-shelf waters of the Wet Tropics.738 Oceanographic processes, such as upwelling and intrusive events, may be more important drivers of inter-annual variability in nutrient concentrations in this area than previously understood.735,738

Sediments

Influx of fine sediments from large flood events can have long-lasting impacts in ecosystems. Immediately after flood events, and for a few months afterwards, fine sediments can stay resuspended in the water column and decrease availability of light reaching the seafloor.39 Flood plume sediment is often associated with increased nutrients delivered to inshore areas, which can favour an increase in macroalgal cover, affecting both coral and seagrass communities.145,185 Sediments deposited on the seafloor can also increase turbidity through chronic wind- and current-driven resuspension, reducing photic depth for long periods of time.1889,1890 Fine sediment primarily affects shallow inshore coral and seagrass communities, and organisms that rely on them.185,145,1891,576 In reef fish, excess sediments can affect some species by inducing changes in feeding behaviour due to increased sediment loads within algal turfs, 1892,1893 doubling larvae development time,1894 reducing growth rates,1895 reducing the ability to find suitable habitat,1896 changing predator–prey interactions 1897 and damaging gill structure.1898

Corals are highly sensitive to chronic exposure to fine sediments, which affects their biology by reducing recruitment and settlement success and smothering adult colonies.39,910,1899,1900 At community level, in the Mackay Whitsunday region, coral communities have been slowly recovering from legacy effects of cyclone Debbie, which severely affected the region in 2017.1901 Following the severe loss of coral cover at many sites post-Debbie, successful recovery relied heavily on the recruitment and survival of juvenile corals, which were significantly reduced by fine sediments present in the water column and deposited in shallow areas. Over the past 5 years, fine sediment deposited by cyclone Debbie has naturally and gradually moved away from the inshore reef region, allowing space for new corals to settle. Even though the density of juvenile corals continued to increase in past 2 years, juvenile density remains low on most reefs, suggesting a bottleneck for the recovery of these communities. Included among the increasing numbers of juveniles are the fast-growing genus Acropora; the survival and growth of these colonies will be central to the recovery trajectory of the coral communities in coming years.185

Fine sediments reduce the quantity and quality of light in Reef ecosystems

Fine sediments can affect seagrass condition by smothering plants and limiting light.1890 The respiratory requirements for survival and growth cannot be met by photosynthesis under low light conditions.1902 In inshore sites, seagrasses are often exposed to a very high frequency of turbid water resulting from resuspended fine sediment, even in low-discharge years. These turbid waters constrain the depth limit of seagrass occurrence and, therefore, influence their spatial extent and cause changes in abundance and resilience.145 In extreme cases, when the disturbance is long-lasting, plant death, changes in species composition or even meadow loss can be observed. 145 The loss of seagrass meadows can have an indirect impact on dugong populations, as dugongs are highly dependent on seagrass for their diet.1903,1904 Reduction in dugong populations, either by migration or by death from starvation, has been linked to reduced seagrass abundance in some areas of the Reef.520,1904

Pesticides

Pesticides are found ubiquitously in the Catchment and inshore areas of the Region.1905, 1852,1830 Concentrations of pesticides above Australian guidelines are often found adjacent to and downstream of areas of horticulture and intensive cropping, particularly sugarcane.1847 These areas are largely located in the Wet Tropics, Burdekin and Mackay Whitsunday regions. 

Mean contributions of individual pesticides in catchment waterways and inshore areas also vary between regions. Pesticide risk and toxicity are assessed collectively as opposed to individually for each pesticide.1850 In inshore areas of the Mackay Whitsunday and Wet Topics regions, diuron, imidacloprid and hexazinone are common, whereas tebuthiuron is often detected in the Burdekin inshore region.1855,1830 ‘Alternative’ photosystem II and non-photosystem II herbicides are increasingly applied as substitutes for effective weed control to help achieve targeted reductions in priority herbicide loads.1906 However, alternative herbicides can exhibit similarities in physico-chemical properties to the priority photosystem II herbicides and, in some cases, can be just as toxic to non-target marine species.1907 Links between organism responses and pesticide exposure in the field are uncertain due to the possibility that other environmental factors, such as temperature, light and other pollutants, can confound responses.1849 In addition, mixtures of pesticides can be associated with higher or lower risk than individual pesticides, depending on the specifics of chemical interactions.1852

Pesticides can impair photosynthesis and reduce calcification rates in corals

In the environment, pesticide runoff losses and degradation vary significantly among different types of pesticides. For example, PSII herbicides, such as diuron and atrazine, which are commonly found in the environment, are estimated to have half-lives between 40 and 100 days, respectively.1846,1908 Although persistence in the environment is lower than some legacy pesticides (such as organochlorine pesticides like DDT), PSII herbicides can persist in marine waters for a significant period of time.1909

While in situ impacts of pesticides are difficult to quantify, deleterious effects have been studied in Reef organisms under controlled laboratory conditions. Pesticide toxic effects have been extensively demonstrated on organisms that rely on photosynthesis for growth and reproduction, such as seagrasses, hard corals, crustose coralline algae and symbiont-bearing foraminifera.1910,1911,1912,1913 Among pesticides, PSII herbicides are commonly studied due to their extensive use and ubiquitous presence in the marine environment.1855,1830 Diuron has been shown to impair photosynthesis and reduce calcification rates in corals and in the calcifying algae Halimeda under short-term exposure.1907,1914 Photosystem II herbicides also negatively affect the growth and photosynthetic efficiency of coral symbionts.1915 Growth rates of and photosynthesis in marine microalgae are also affected by herbicides.1907,1916

In addition to herbicides, exposure to several insecticides (diazinon, fipronil and imidacloprid) and fungicides (chlorothalonil and propiconazole) has been shown to negatively affect all life-history stages of corals.1917 Insecticides inhibit fertilisation and metamorphosis, as well as reduce coral settlement.1917,1918

Pesticide concentrations in the inshore Reef are typically highest over the summer wet season,1856 making inshore areas frequently co-exposed to herbicides and high seasonal water temperatures, which exacerbates the toxic effects of pesticides in reef species.1914,1919,1920 However, the cumulative effects of heat stress and pesticides on ecosystems remain poorly understood. 

Marine debris

Marine debris is a major threat to the health and values of the Region and causes mortality of marine turtles, dugongs, dolphins and seabirds.1865,1921 Marine debris is commonly found in the Region; however, the sources of marine debris, particularly plastics, vary with geographical position. Land-based sources contribute approximately 80 per cent of anthropogenic debris in marine environments. The vast majority of debris found in the Region is plastic.1922 Land-based runoff and stormwater systems are believed to be the main source of marine debris and plastic in coastal and inshore areas.1923,1872 Islands are often the repository of windborne plastics, as well as general waste associated with tourism activities (fishing, boating and presence on islands), commercial boating and fishing, and localised stormwater runoff.1867,1868,1869,1924 Marine debris can float, sink, become entangled on rocky outcrops or reefs, or become buried in the sea floor where it can resurface after disturbances, such as cyclones and floods.1921 It can also break down into smaller particles with long-lasting impacts in the environment.1925 

Marine microplastics can bioconcentrate and bioaccumulate in reef organisms, but in contrast to other pollutants such as metals, biomagnification is not as common as previously described.383,1480,1862 Microplastics also act as carriers for a range of toxic substances.1925 Ingestion of microplastics is common and can affect the health of corals, fish, marine turtles, seabirds and cetaceans.1926,1927,1861,1862 Coral reefs, and reef-building corals, in particular, intercept and accumulate microplastics.1928

: A mass of blue fishing net washed up on the sand with 2 dead marine turtles entangled in it.
Ghost nets can cause entanglement that leads to death in turtles. © Commonwealth of Australia (Reef Authority). Photographer: Rohana Rogan-Darvill 2021

Other pollutants 

In the Region, pollutant sources — such as agriculture and mining runoff, ports and harbours, drainage from acid sulfate soils, industrial effluents and emissions, atmospheric deposition, urban centres and wastewater discharge — all contribute to elevated concentrations of metals and metalloids in receiving waters.1867 Metals are highly persistent and remain in the environment indefinitely, binding to fine particulate sediment and settling on the substrate where concentrations are absorbed by reef organisms. Often, metals bioaccumulate at greater concentrations than those detected in the surrounding environment.1929 High metal concentrations have been detected in inshore seagrass meadows, which are a key food source for some species of marine turtles.1930,1931 Turtles are also known to graze on turf algae. Elevated metal loads in seagrass and turf algae could translate into accumulation of metals in turtle tissues.1932 Similar accumulation could also occur in herbivorous and detritivorous reef fishes. High metal concentrations may also alter fish feeding behaviour.1876 Accumulation of metals in key food sources for herbivorous animals may represent a pathway through which metals enter reef food chains and cause deleterious effects to marine mammals and other apex predators.

Many pharmaceuticals and personal care products, such as ultraviolet light filters and antibiotics, are persistent, bioaccumulative and potentially toxic.1933 They may, therefore, affect the health of reef organisms. However, the persistence and potential impacts of such products on reef ecosystems are knowledge gaps.

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) often bioaccumulate in food webs and can cause deleterious effects on growth, reproduction, metabolism and survival of reef organisms.1879 These products often have long half-lives that range from decades to centuries. They are considered resistant to metabolic, chemical, microbial and photolytic degradation procedures.1934 However, the toxicity of POPs, such as petroleum hydrocarbons, can substantially increase in the presence of ultraviolet light, causing severe impacts on the settlement of coral larvae in shallow reef environments.1935,1936 Exposure to oil derivatives can also alter habitat settlement and antipredator behaviours, reduce sheltering and shoaling, and increase risk taking in reef fish. These effects all exacerbate predator-induced mortality during recruitment, resulting in disruption of early life-history stages.1937

References
  • 39. Collier, C., Brown, A., Fabricius, K., Lewis, S., Diaz-Pulido, G. et al. 2024, 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement: Summary | Evidence Statement for Question 3.2: What are the measured impacts of increased sediment and particulate nutrient loads on GBR ecosystems, what are the mechanism(s) for those impacts and where is there evidence of this occurring in the GBR? in 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement on land-based impacts on Great Barrier Reef water quality and ecosystem condition, eds J. Waterhouse, M. Pineda and K. Sambrook, Commonwealth of Australia and Queensland Government.
  • 42. Waterhouse, J., Pineda, M., Sambrook, K., Newlands, M., McKenzie, L., et al. 2024, 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement: Conclusions, in 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement on land-based impacts on Great Barrier Reef water quality and ecosystem condition, eds J. Waterhouse, M. Pineda and K. Sambrook, Commonwealth of Australia and Queensland Government.
  • 132. Burkholder, J.M., Tomasko, D.A. and Touchette, B.W. 2007, Seagrasses and eutrophication, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350(1-2): 46-72.
  • 145. McKenzie, L.J., Collier, C.J., Langlois, L.A. and Yoshida, R.L. 2023, Marine Monitoring Program: annual report for inshore seagrass monitoring 2021–22. Report for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 175. Mellin, C., Thompson, A., Jonker, M.J. and Emslie, M.J. 2019, Cross-shelf variation in coral community response to disturbance on the Great Barrier Reef, Diversity 11(3): 38.
  • 185. Thompson, A., Davidson, J., Logan, M. and Thompson, C. 2023, Marine Monitoring Program Annual Report for Inshore Coral Reef Monitoring: 2021–22. Report for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 276. Diaz-Pulido, G., Reyes-Nivia, C., Adame, M.F., Arthington, A., Collier, C. and Lovelock, C. 2024, 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement: Summary | Evidence Statement for Question 4.2: What are the measured impacts of nutrients on GBR ecosystems, what are the mechanism(s) for those impacts and where is there evidence of this occurring in the GBR? in 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement on land-based impacts on Great Barrier Reef water quality and ecosystem condition, eds J. Waterhouse, M. Pineda and K. Sambrook, Commonwealth of Australia and Queensland Government.
  • 383. Miller, M.E., Hamann, M. and Kroon, F.J. 2020, Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of microplastics in marine organisms: A review and meta-analysis of current data, PloS One 15(10): e0240792.
  • 520. Cleguer, C. and Marsh, H. 2023, An inventory of dugong aerial surveys in Australia. Report to the National Environmental Science Program. Report 23/15, Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), Townsville, Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), Townsville.
  • 528. Devlin, M.J. and Brodie, J. 2005, Terrestrial discharge into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon: nutrient behavior in coastal waters, Marine Pollution Bulletin 51(1-4): 9-22.
  • 571. Lesser, M.P. 2021, Eutrophication on coral reefs: What is the evidence for phase shifts, nutrient limitation and coral bleaching, BioScience 71(12): 1216-1233.
  • 573. Ortiz, J., Wolff, N.H., Anthony, K.R.N., Devlin, M., Lewis, S., et al. 2018, Impaired recovery of the Great Barrier Reef under cumulative stress, Science Advances 4(7): eaar6127.
  • 576. Lambert, V., Bainbridge, Z.T., Collier, C., Lewis, S.E., Adams, M.P., et al. 2021, Connecting targets for catchment sediment loads to ecological outcomes for seagrass using multiple lines of evidence, Marine Pollution Bulletin 169: 112494.
  • 586. Lewis, S., Bainbridge, Z. and Smithers, S. 2024, 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement: Summary | Evidence Statement for Question 3.1: What are the spatial and temporal distributions of terrigenous sediments and associated indicators within the GBR? in 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement on land-based impacts on Great Barrier Reef water quality and ecosystem condition, eds J. Waterhouse, M. Pineda and K. Sambrook, Commonwealth of Australia and Queensland Government.
  • 595. Garzon-Garcia, A., Burton, J.M., Lewis, S., Bainbridge, Z., De Hayr, R., et al. 2021, The bioavailability of nitrogen associated with sediment in riverine plumes of the Great Barrier Reef, Marine Pollution Bulletin 173: 112910.
  • 693. Waterhouse, J., Brodie, J., Tracey, D., Smith, R., Vandergragt, M., et al. 2017, Scientific Consensus Statement 2017: A synthesis of the science of land-based water quality impacts on the Great Barrier Reef, Chapter 3: The risk from anthropogenic pollutants to Great Barrier Reef coastal and marine ecosystems, State of Queensland, Brisbane.
  • 703. Skerratt, J.H., Mongin, M., Baird, M.E., Wild-Allen, K.A., Robson, B.J., et al. 2019, Simulated nutrient and plankton dynamics in the Great Barrier Reef (2011–2016), Journal of Marine Systems 192: 51-74.
  • 731. Morris, L.A., Voolstra, C.R., Quigley, K.M., Bourne, D.G., Bay, L.K. 2019, Nutrient availability and metabolism affect the stability of coral–Symbiodiniaceae symbioses, Trends in Microbiology 27(8): 678-689.
  • 733. D’Angelo, C., Wiedenmann, J. 2014, Impacts of nutrient enrichment on coral reefs: new perspectives and implications for coastal management and reef survival, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 7: 82-93.
  • 735. Caballes, C.F., Sambrook, K. and Pratchett, M.S. 2024, 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement: Summary | Evidence Statement for Question 4.3: What are the key drivers of the population outbreaks of Crown of Thorns Starfish (COTS) on the GBR, and what is the evidence for the contribution of nutrients from land-runoff to these outbreaks? in 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement on land-based impacts on Great Barrier Reef water quality and ecosystem condition, eds J. Waterhouse, M. Pineda and K. Sambrook, Commonwealth of Australia and Queensland Government.
  • 738. Kroon, F.J., Crosswell, J.R. and Robson, B.J. 2023, The effect of catchment load reductions on water quality in the crown-of-thorn starfish outbreak initiation zone, Marine Pollution Bulletin 195: 115255.
  • 768. Clements, M., Selvakumaraswamy, P., Deaker, D. and Byrne, M. 2022, Freshening of Great Barrier Reef waters is deleterious for larval crown-of-thorns starfish, counter to the terrestrial runoff hypothesis, Marine Ecology Progress Series 696: 1-14.
  • 771. Gruber, R., Waterhouse, J., Logan, M., Petus, C., Howley, C., et al. 2020, Marine Monitoring Program: a annual report for inshore water quality monitoring 2018-19, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 910. Wakwella, A., Mumby, P.J. and Roff, G. 2020, Sedimentation and overfishing drive changes in early succession and coral recruitment, Proceedings of the Royal Society B 287(1941): 20202575.
  • 919. Waterhouse, J., Pearson, R., Lewis, S., Davis, A. and Waltham, N. 2024, 7. Great Barrier Reef ecohydrology, in Oceanographic Processes of Coral Reefs. Physical and Biological Links in The Great Barrier Reef, eds E. Wolanski and M.J. Kingsford, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 105-125.
  • 1010. Pratchett, M.S., Caballes, C.F., Wilmes, J.C., Matthews, S., Mellin, C., et al. 2017, Thirty years of research on crown-of-thorns starfish (1986–2016): scientific advances and emerging opportunities, Diversity 9(4): 41.
  • 1021. Brodie, J., Devlin, M. and Lewis, S. 2017, Potential enhanced survivorship of crown of thorns starfish larvae due to near-annual nutrient enrichment during secondary outbreaks on the central mid-shelf of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Diversity 9(1): 17.
  • 1405. Mellin, C., Matthews, S., Anthony, K.R.N., Brown, S.C., Caley, M.J., et al. 2019, Spatial resilience of the Great Barrier Reef under cumulative disturbance impacts, Global Change Biology 25(7): 2431– 2445.
  • 1480. Miller, M.E., Motti, C.A., Hamann, M., Kroon, F.J. 2023, Assessment of microplastic bioconcentration, bioaccumulation and biomagnification in a simple coral reef food web, Science of the Total Environment 858: 159615.
  • 1830. Kaserzon, S., Shiels, R., Elisei, G., Paxman, C., Li, Y., Carswell, C., Xia, S., Prasad, P., Gallen, M., Reeks, T., Thompson, K., Taucare, G., Marano, K., Gorji, S.G., Mueller, J. 2024, Marine Monitoring Program: annual report for inshore pesticide monitoring 2022–23. Report for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 1840. Devlin, M. and Brodie, J. 2023, Nutrients and Eutrophication, in Marine Pollution – Monitoring, management and mitigation, ed. A. Reichelt-Brushett, Springer, Cham, pp. 75-100.
  • 1846. Skerratt, J., Baird, M.E., Mongin, M., Ellis, R., Smith, R.A., et al. 2023, Dispersal of the pesticide diuron in the Great Barrier Reef, The Science of the Total Environment 879: 163041.
  • 1847. Brodie, J. and Landos, M. 2019, Pesticides in Queensland and Great Barrier Reef waterways - potential impacts on aquatic ecosystems and the failure of national management, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 230: 106447.
  • 1849. Negri, A.P., Taucare, G., Neale, P., Neelamraju, C., Kaminski, H., et al. 2024, 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement: Summary | Evidence Statement for Question 5.1: What is the spatial and temporal distribution of pesticides across GBR ecosystems? What are the (potential or observed) ecological impacts in these ecosystems? What evidence is there for pesticide risk? in 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement on land-based impacts on Great Barrier Reef water quality and ecosystem condition, eds J. Waterhouse, M. Pineda and K. Sambrook, Commonwealth of Australia and Queensland Government.
  • 1850. Warne, M.St.J., Neelamraju, C., Strauss, J., Smith R.A., Turner, R.D.R., Mann, R.M. 2020, Development of a method for estimating the toxicity of pesticide mixtures and a Pesticide Risk Baseline for the Reef 2050 Water Quality Improvement Plan, Queensland Government, Brisbane.
  • 1852. Warne, M.S.J., Neelamraju, C., Strauss, J., Turner, R.D.R., Smith, R.A., et al. 2023, Estimating the aquatic risk from exposure to up to twenty-two pesticide active ingredients in waterways discharging to the Great Barrier Reef, The Science of the Total Environment 892: 164632.
  • 1855. Thai, P., Paxman, C., Prasad, P., Elisei, G., Reeks, T., Eaglesham, G., Yeh, R., Tracey, D., Grant, S., Mueller, J. 2020, Marine Monitoring Program: Annual Report for inshore pesticide monitoring 2018-19. Report to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 1856. Gallen, C., Thai, P., Paxman, C., Prasad, P., Elisei, G., et al. 2019, Marine Monitoring Program: Annual Report for Inshore Pesticide Monitoring 2017-2018, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 1861. Critchell, K., Bauer-Civiello, A., Benham, C., Berry, K., Eagle, L., et al. 2019, Plastic pollution in the coastal environment: current challenges and future solutions, in Coasts and Estuaries, eds E. Wolanski, J.W. Day, M. Elliott and R. Ramachandran, Elsevier, pp. 595-609.
  • 1862. Rochman, C.M., Browne, M.A., Underwood, A.J., Van Franeker, J.A., Thompson, R.C., et al. 2016, The ecological impacts of marine debris: unraveling the demonstrated evidence from what is perceived, Ecology 97(2): 302-312.
  • 1865. Smith, C.E., Gilby, B.L., van de Merwe, J., Jones, J., Tait, H., et al. 2024, Predictive modelling reveals Australian continental risk hotspots for marine debris interactions with key threatened species, Global Change Biology 30: e17313.
  • 1867. Kroon, F.J., Berry, K.L.E., Brinkman, D.L., Kookana, R., Leusch, F.D.L., et al. 2020, Sources, presence and potential effects of contaminants of emerging concern in the marine environments of the Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait, Australia, Science of the Total Environment 719: 135140.
  • 1868. Miller, M.E., Santana, M.F.M., Carsique, M., Motti, C.A., Hamann, M., et al. 2022, Temporal patterns of plastic contamination in surface waters at the SS Yongala shipwreck, Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Environmental Pollution 307: 119545.
  • 1869. Carbery, M., Herb, F., Reynes, J., Pham, C.K., Fong, W., et al. 2022, How small is the big problem? Small microplastics Marine Pollution Bulletin 184: 114179.
  • 1872. Roman, L., Warmbrunn, A., Lawson, T.J., Willis, K., Wilcox, C., et al. 2021, Comparing marine anthropogenic debris on inhabited mainland beaches, coastal islands, and uninhabited offshore islands: a case study from Queensland and the Coral Sea, Australia, Marine Pollution Bulletin 172: 112919.
  • 1876. Tebbett, S.B., Bellwood, D.R., Johnson, E.R. and Chase, T.J. 2022, Occurrence and accumulation of heavy metals in algal turf particulates and sediments on coral reefs, Marine Pollution Bulletin 184: 114113.
  • 1879. van Dam, J.W., Negri, A. P., Uthicke, S., Mueller, J. F. 2011, Chemical pollution on coral reefs: exposure and ecological effects, in Ecological impacts of toxic chemicals, ed. Sánchez-Bayo, F., van den Brink, P. J., Mann, R. M., Bentham Science Publisher, United Arabic Emirates, pp. 187-211.
  • 1880. Ceccarelli, D.M., Evans, R.D., Logan, M., Mantel, P., Puotinen, M., et al. 2020, Long-term dynamics and drivers of coral and macroalgal cover on inshore reefs of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 30(1): 01635.
  • 1881. Kroon, F. J., Thorburn, P., Schaffelke, B., Whitten, S. 2016, Towards protecting the Great Barrier Reef from land‐based pollution, Global Change Biology 22(6): 1985-2002.
  • 1882. Margvelashvili, N., Andrewartha, J., Baird, M., Herzfeld, M., Jones, E., et al. 2018, Simulated fate of catchment-derived sediment on the Great Barrier Reef shelf, Marine Pollution Bulletin 135: 954-962.
  • 1883. Department of Environment and Science 2018, Reef 2050 Water Quality Improvement Plan 2017-2022, Queensland Government, Brisbane.
  • 1884. MacNeil, M.A., Mellin, C., Matthews, S., Wolff, N.H., McClanahan, T.R., et al. 2019, Water quality mediates resilience on the Great Barrier Reef, Nature Ecology and Evolution 3(4): 620-627.
  • 1885. Brodie, J.E., Devlin, M., Haynes, D. and Waterhouse, J. 2011, Assessment of the eutrophication status of the Great Barrier Reef lagoon (Australia), Biogeochemistry 106: 281-302.
  • 1886. Wooldridge, S.A. 2020, Excess seawater nutrients, enlarged algal symbiont densities and bleaching sensitive reef locations: 1. Identifying thresholds of concern for the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Marine Pollution Bulletin 152: 107667.
  • 1887. Udy, J.W., Dennison, W.C., Long, W.J.L., McKenzie, L.J. 1999, Responses of seagrass to nutrients in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Marine Ecology Progress Series 185: 257-271.
  • 1888. Pratchett, M.S., Caballes, C.F., Cvitanovic, C., Raymundo, M.L., Babcock, R.C., et al. 2021, Knowledge gaps in the biology, ecology, and management of the pacific crown-of-thorns sea star Acanthaster sp. on Australia's Great Barrier Reef, The Biological Bulletin 241(3): 330-346.
  • 1889. Lewis, S., Bainbridge, Z. 2021, Much more than just sediments: The importance of sediment composition for Great Barrier Reef ecosystems. Report to the National Environmental Science Program, Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns.
  • 1890. Lewis, S., Bainbridge, Z. Stevens, T., Garzon-Garcia, A., Chen, C., et al. 2020, What’s really damaging the Reef?: Tracing the origin and fate of the ecologically detrimental sediment and associated bioavailable nutrients. Report to the National Environmental Science Program, Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns.
  • 1891. D’Olivo, J.P., McCulloch, M.T., Judd, K. 2013, Long-term records of coral calcification across the central Great Barrier Reef: assessing the impacts of river runoff and climate change, Coral Reefs 32: 999-1012.
  • 1892. Tebbett, S.B., Goatley, C.H.R. and Bellwood, D.R. 2017, Fine sediments suppress detritivory on coral reefs, Marine Pollution Bulletin 114(2): 934-940.
  • 1893. Gordon, S.E., Goatley, C.H., Bellwood, D.R. 2016, Low-quality sediments deter grazing by the parrotfish Scarus rivulatus on inner-shelf reefs, Coral Reefs 35: 285-291.
  • 1894. Wenger, A.S., McCormick, M.I., Endo, G.G.K., McLeod, I.M., Kroon, F.J., et al. 2014, Suspended sediment prolongs larval development in a coral reef fish, The Journal of Experimental Biology 217(Pt 7): 1122-1128.
  • 1895. Wenger, A.S., Johansen, J.L., Jones, G.P. 2012, Increasing suspended sediment reduces foraging, growth and condition of a planktivorous damselfish, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 428: 43-48.
  • 1896. Wenger, A.S., Johansen, J.L., Jones, G.P. 2011, Suspended sediment impairs habitat choice and chemosensory discrimination in two coral reef fishes, Coral Reefs 30: 879-887.
  • 1897. Wenger, A.S., McCormick, M., McLeod, I.M., Jones, G.P. 2013, Suspended sediment alters predator-prey interactions between two coral reef fish, Coral Reefs 32(2): 369-374.
  • 1898. Hess, S., Prescott, L.J., Hoey, A.S., McMahon, S.A., Wenger, A.S., et al. 2017, Species-specific impacts of suspended sediments on gill structure and function in coral reef fishes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 284(1866): 20171279.
  • 1899. Jones, R., Ricardo, G. F., Negri, A. P. 2015, Effects of sediments on the reproductive cycle of corals, Marine Pollution Bulletin 100(1): 13-33.
  • 1900. Humanes, A., Fink, A., Willis, B.L., Fabricius, K.E., de Beer, D., et al. 2017, Effects of suspended sediments and nutrient enrichment on juvenile corals, Marine Pollution Bulletin 125(1-2): 166-175.
  • 1901. Thompson, A., Costello, P., Davidson, J., Logan, M., Coleman, G., et al. 2018, Marine Monitoring Program. Annual Report for Coral Reef Monitoring: 2016 to 2017, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 1902. Collier, C.J., Adams, M.P., Langlois, L., Waycott, M., O’Brien, K.R., Maxwell, P.S., McKenzie, L. 2016, Thresholds for morphological response to light reduction for four tropical seagrass species, Ecological Indicators 67: 358-366.
  • 1903. Marsh, H., Grech, A., McMahon, K. 2018, Dugongs: seagrass community specialists, in Seagrasses of Australia: Structure, Ecology and Conservation, eds A.W.D. Larkum, G.A. Kendrick and P.J. Ralph, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 629-661.
  • 1904. Marsh, H. and Cleguer, C. 2024, Interactions between dugong biology and the biophysical determinants of their environment: a review, in Oceanographic processes of coral reefs, eds E. Wolanski and M. Kingsford, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 194-209.
  • 1905. Warne, M.S.J., Smith, R.A., Turner, R.D.R. 2020, Analysis of pesticide mixtures discharged to the lagoon of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Environmental Pollution 265: 114088.
  • 1906. Davis, A.M., Lewis, S.E., Brodie, J.E. and Benson, A. 2014, The potential benefits of herbicide regulation: A cautionary note for the Great Barrier Reef catchment area, Science of the Total Environment 490: 81-92.
  • 1907. Thomas, M.C., Flores, F., Kaserzon, S., Fisher, R., Negri, A.P. 2020, Toxicity of ten herbicides to the tropical marine microalgae Rhodomonas salina, Scientific Reports 10(1): 7612.
  • 1908. Mercurio, P., Mueller, J.F., Eaglesham, G., O'Brien, J., Flores, F., Negri, A.P. 2016, Degradation of herbicides in the tropical marine environment: Influence of light and sediment, PLoS One 11(11): e0165890.
  • 1909. Haynes, D., Müller, J., Carter, S. 2000, Pesticide and herbicide residues in sediments and seagrasses from the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area and Queensland coast, Marine Pollution Bulletin 41(7-12): 279-287.
  • 1910. Wilkinson, A.D., Collier, C.J., Flores, F., Langlois, L., Ralph, P.J., et al. 2017, Combined effects of temperature and the herbicide diuron on Photosystem II activity of the tropical seagrass Halophila ovalis, Scientific Reports 7: 45404.
  • 1911. van Dam, J.W., Negri, A.P., Mueller, J.F., Uthicke, S. 2012, Symbiont-specific responses in foraminifera to the herbicide diuron, Marine Pollution Bulletin 65(4-9): 373-383.
  • 1912. Negri, A.P., Flores, F., Mercurio, P., Mueller, J.F. and Collier, C.J. 2015, Lethal and sub-lethal chronic effects of the herbicide diuron on seagrass, Aquatic Toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 165: 73-83.
  • 1913. Negri, A.P., Flores, F., Röthig, T., Uthicke, S. 2011, Herbicides increase the vulnerability of corals to rising sea surface temperature, Limnology and Oceanography 568(2): 471-485.
  • 1914. Flores, F., Marques, J.A., Uthicke, S., Fisher, R., Patel, F., et al. 2021, Combined effects of climate change and the herbicide diuron on the coral Acropora millepora, Marine Pollution Bulletin 169: 112582.
  • 1915. Marzonie, M., Flores, F., Sadoun, N., Thomas, M.C., Valada-Mennuni, A., et al. 2021, Toxicity thresholds of nine herbicides to coral symbionts (Symbiodiniaceae), Scientific Reports 11(1): 21636-3.
  • 1916. Thomas, M.C., Flores, F., Kaserzon, S., Reeks, T.A. and Negri, A.P. 2020, Toxicity of the herbicides diuron, propazine, tebuthiuron, and haloxyfop to the diatom Chaetoceros muelleri, Scientific Reports 10(1): 19592-0.
  • 1917. Flores, F., Kaserzon, S., Elisei, G., Ricardo, G. and Negri, A.P. 2020, Toxicity thresholds of three insecticides and two fungicides to larvae of the coral Acropora tenuis, PeerJ 8: e9615.
  • 1918. Markey, K.L., Baird, A.H., Humphrey, C., Negri, A.P. 2007, Insecticides and a fungicide affect multiple coral life stages, Marine Ecology Progress Series 330: 127-137.
  • 1919. Marques, J.A., Flores, F., Patel, F., Bianchini, A., Uthicke, S., et al. 2020, Acclimation history modulates effect size of calcareous algae (Halimeda opuntia) to herbicide exposure under future climate scenarios, The Science of the total environment 739: 140308.
  • 1920. van Dam, J.W., Negri, A.P., Mueller, J.F., Altenburger, R. and Uthicke, S. 2012, Additive pressures of elevated sea surface temperatures and herbicides on symbiont-bearing foraminifera, PloS One 7(3): e33900.
  • 1921. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2018, Position Statement: Marine Debris (Document No 100481), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 1922. Kroon, F.J., Berry, K.L.E., Brinkman, D.L., Davis, A., King, O., et al. 2016, Identification, impacts, and prioritisation of emerging contaminants present in the GBR and Torres Strait marine environments, Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns.
  • 1923. Bauer-Civiello, A., Critchell, K., Hoogenboom, M., Hamann, M. 2019, Input of plastic debris in an urban tropical river system, Marine Pollution Bulletin 144: 235-242.
  • 1924. Wilson, S.P., Verlis, K.M. 2017, The ugly face of tourism: Marine debris pollution linked to visitation in the southern Great Barrier Reef, Australia, Marine Pollution Bulletin 117(1-2): 239-246.
  • 1925. Thacharodi, A., Meenatchi, R., Hassan, S., Hussain, N., Bhat, M.A., et al. 2024, Microplastics in the environment: A critical overview on its fate, toxicity, implications, management, and bioremediation strategies, Journal of Environmental Management 349: 119433.
  • 1926. Hall, N.M., Berry, K.L.E., Rintoul, L., Hoogenboom, M.O. 2015, Microplastic ingestion by scleractinian corals, Marine Biology 162: 725-732.
  • 1927. Critchell, K., Hoogenboom, M.O. 2018, Effects of microplastic exposure on the body condition and behaviour of planktivorous reef fish (Acanthochromis polyacanthus), PLoS One 13(3): e0193308.
  • 1928. Soares, M.O., Rizzo, L., Ximenes Neto, A.R., Barros, Y., Martinelli Filho, J.E., et al. 2023, Do coral reefs act as sinks for microplastics? Environmental Pollution 337: 122509.
  • 1929. Jarolimek, C.V., King, J.J., Apte, S.C., Hall, J., Gautam, A., Gillmore, M., Doyle, C. 2023, A review of inorganic contaminants in Australian marine mammals, birds and turtles, Environmental Chemistry 20(4): 147-170.
  • 1930. Wilkinson, A., Ariel, E., van de Merwe, J.,Brodie, J. 2022, Trace element concentrations in forage seagrass species of Chelonia mydas along the Great Barrier Reef, PLoS One 17(6): e0269806.
  • 1931. Thomas, C.R., Bennett, W.W., Garcia, C., Simmonds, A., Honchin, C., Turner, R., Hof, C.A.M., Bell, I. 2020, Coastal bays and coral cays: Multi-element study of Chelonia mydas forage in the Great Barrier Reef (2015-2017), Science of the Total Environment 740: 140042.
  • 1932. Wilkinson, A., Ariel, E., Van De Merwe, J., Brodie, J. 2023, Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas) Blood and Scute Trace Element Concentrations in the Northern Great Barrier Reef, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 42(11): 2375-2388.
  • 1933. Molins-Delgado, D., Diaz-Cruz, M.S., Barcelo, D. 2014, Personal care products in the aquatic environment, in Personal Care Products in the Aquatic Environment. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 36, eds M.S. Diaz-Cruz and D. Barcelo, Springer, Cham, pp. 1-34.
  • 1934. Kirkok, S.K., Kibet, J.K., Kinyanjui, T.K., Okanga, F.I. 2020, A review of persistent organic pollutants: Dioxins, furans, and their associated nitrogenated analogues, SN Applied Sciences 2: 1-20.
  • 1935. Nordborg, F.M., Jones, R.J., Oelgemöller, M., Negri, A.P. 2020, The effects of ultraviolet radiation and climate on oil toxicity to coral reef organisms–a review, Science of the Total Environment 720: 137486.
  • 1936. Nordborg, F.M., Flores, F., Brinkman, D.L., Agustí, S., Negri, A.P. 2018, Phototoxic effects of two common marine fuels on the settlement success of the coral Acropora tenuis, Scientific Reports 8(1): 8635.
  • 1937. Johansen, J.L., Allan, B.J., Rummer, J.L., Esbaugh, A.J. 2017, Oil exposure disrupts early life-history stages of coral reef fishes via behavioural impairments, Nature Ecology & Evolution 1(8): 1146-1152.