4.5.1 Social heritage values

Social heritage values are defined as a collective attachment to place that embodies meanings and values that are important to a community or communities”.1156 Australians report the Great Barrier Reef as a national icon with which they personally identify and are proud of its world heritage status.1075 

The social heritage values of the Great Barrier Reef are affected by the condition of the Reef’s ecosystem values, by changes to general social conditions and changes to social conditions specific to interactions with the Reef. Since 2019, the two largest changes to general social conditions affecting the social heritage values have been a rising global sense of urgency for climate action and the COVID-19 pandemic. The Sixth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report, released in 2023 included clear warnings on the anticipated risks of global warming without immediate action, and issued an urgent call to action.1157 These two factors have caused broad and specific changes in the Reef’s social heritage values.

A photograph of the silhouette of a man standing on a beach near the edge of the water at sunrise, looking toward the sea and a mountain range. Two empty kayaks rest nearby.
The Region’s beautiful places foster wellbeing, Hideaway Bay. © Rohana Rogan-Darvill 2021

The Social and Economic Long-Term Monitoring Program (SELTMP) is a key source of information for changes in the Reef’s social heritage values that relate to people’s perceptions and attitudes. This program collects primary data using survey methods focused on a subset of Great Barrier Reef human dimension indicators relating to social, economic, cultural and governance aspects of the Reef.1075

A healthy Reef provides benefits to people and communities and fosters wellbeing

The social heritage values of the Reef constitute aspects of the wellbeing of local, regional, state, national and international communities. A healthy Great Barrier Reef provides material and non-material benefits to people which result in wellbeing outcomes. These benefits accrue to people that interact with the Reef, through livelihoods, relaxation and enjoyment and, in turn, influence mental and physical health and prosperity. 

These benefits also affect people remotely: from the Reef’s prominence in the Australian national identity and further afield to the intrinsic value of the existence of the Reef as a world heritage treasure for humanity. These material and non-material benefits are part of an individual’s life satisfaction, relevant across the wellbeing indicators. Community relationships with a healthy Reef have consequential and cumulative impacts, which are difficult to quantify. The flipside of strong place attachment and wellbeing attributed to connection to the Reef emerges as ‘ecological grief’, expressed when the Reef’s health declines.1075,1158,1159

An image of a piece of artwork by Marion Gaemers. A white coral reefscape has been made from ghost net and rope found on the beach. There is a mid of brain, branching and tubular type corals.
Bleached reef (detail). Ghostnet Collective 2024 © Marion Gaemers. Made from ghost net and beach foundrope. Image © Marion Gaemers 2024 

The assessment of the Region’s social heritage values considers: access; aesthetics; appreciation, understanding and enjoyment; human health; personal connection; equity; empowerment; employment and income (Figure 4.5).1160

Figure 4.5
Values of importance to human wellbeing

Values of importance to assessing the social heritage of the Region are intrinsically linked to human wellbeing. Source: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2017)1160

A two-tiered diagram with an elongated icon listing Human wellbeing in the first line of its top tier, followed by the associated adjectives healthy, secure, sustainable, cohesive and prosperous in the second line.

Access refers to people’s ability to enter and use the Reef and its resources in the past, present and future. Accessing and interacting with nature improves physical and mental health and general wellbeing.1075 The COVID-19 pandemic affected people’s access to the Reef and the impacts varied depending on a person’s residential proximity to the Reef and different state regulations. The restrictions on movement made access easier for people that live near the Reef and proportionately more difficult for those living further away and unable to travel. All international travel to Australia, and therefore the Reef, was suspended from March 2020 until February 2022; and resumed with a range of restrictions. During this time, there was a diversion of people away from centralised workplaces and large population centres to regional areas, with the largest internal migration to Queensland (Section 6.2.2).1161

In 2021, more than two thirds of surveyed Catchment residents do not see access to the Reef as a problem.1075 The majority of respondents (83 per cent) reported visiting the Reef at least once in their lifetime and half had visited within the preceding 12-month period. Catchment residents predominantly access inshore areas of the Reef, estuaries and waterways.1075 In general, people continue to enjoy good access and continue to visit the Reef. 

The aesthetic heritage values important to wellbeing are discussed in Section 4.5.2

Understanding the ecology of the Reef and people’s relationships to it has implications for personal connection, empowerment, and stewardship.1160 Some Social and Economic Long-Term Monitoring Program results suggest a medium knowledge of the Reef. This value also considers people’s perceptions about Reef management and scientific knowledge. Another indicator of understanding is people’s perceptions of the health of the Reef, threats, and threat severity, including climate change (Section 9.3).1162 Residents’ perceptions about management of the Reef vary widely. The overall average suggests dissatisfaction with how the Reef is managed, encompassing responses ranging from very positive views to the very negative end of satisfaction with Reef management. Slightly more than 50 per cent of those surveyed felt there was a lack of opportunity to have a say how the Great Barrier Reef is managed, with 70 per cent reporting they did not feel they have any influence over how the Reef is managed.

The two most highly trusted sources of information about the Reef are scientists and the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority;1075 newspapers and social media were the least trusted information sources. The level of trust in scientists for information, while reported as high in 2021, has decreased since the 2017 survey but is still higher than in 2013. In 2021, trust in the Reef Authority as an information source was at similar levels to 2017.1075 

Human health can be linked to visiting the Reef, which in turn, provides benefits to wellbeing. Most survey respondents who had visited the Reef in their lifetime reported that their visit had made them feel physically better. They reported both physiological and psychological benefits from the Reef, including helping them unwind and destress, feeling restored and relaxed, being alert and better able to concentrate.1075 

People’s feelings of strong personal connection to the Reef continues.1075 In general, individuals who visit the Reef report a strong feeling that the Reef is part of their identity; a sentiment that has remained the same since 2017. Most Catchment residents (90 per cent of those surveyed) expressed pride that the Great Barrier Reef is a World Heritage Area and have a strong sense of belonging to where they live. Feelings of pride in the Reef were slightly lower in 2021 than in 2017. Residents place high value on the mere existence of the Great Barrier Reef and its biodiversity. Of respondents who had visited the Reef in the past 12 months, less than 14 per cent viewed the Reef as in poor or very poor health. People perceived coral and seagrass to be in poorer health than beaches and islands.

Equity relates to fairness in the distribution of benefits and impacts across the community. It is both intra- and intergenerational, meaning there are considerations for social equity within each generation, as well as between generations. Approximately three quarters of Catchment residents surveyed place a high value on the bequest value of the Great Barrier Reef (bequest meaning passing on benefits to the next generations).1075 

Empowerment is the process that enables people and groups (such as businesses, community groups, individuals and Traditional Owners) to undertake actions and participate meaningfully in the protection and management of the Great Barrier Reef. Empowerment is interconnected with, and results from, a combination of the other social heritage values. A good indicator of empowerment is the ability to successfully engage in stewardship activities. In 2021, general stewardship sentiment towards the Reef is reported to be high, while actual knowledge and feelings of personal capacity to effect change are low.1075,1163 Approximately 90 per cent of survey respondents reported engaging in simple best practices relevant to Reef health. People’s understanding of the threats to the Reef, particularly climate change, has increased since the Outlook Report 2019, while feelings of empowerment to address these issues are low. In a national survey, approximately 75 per cent of respondents agreed that action should be taken to help the Reef and supported the use of large-scale restoration and adaptation technologies.1162

Employment and income potential of Catchment residents may be affected by Reef health. In 2021, respondents mostly did not feel that their employment prospects or financial situation would be negatively affected, or that they would choose to relocate out of the Region, if the health of the Reef declined. While respondents did not think a decline in the health of the Reef would make living in the Region undesirable, about half felt their lifestyle would be negatively affected (Section 6.2.1). 

Enquiries into the human dimensions of the Reef have been notably extended since 2019. This additional evidence contributes to the social heritage values of the Region being in a good condition.

References
  • 1156. Jones, S. and Leech, S. 2015, Valuing the historic environment: a critical review of existing approaches to social value, Report for the AHRC Cultural Value Report, Manchester.
  • 1075. Hobman, E. V., Mankad, A., Pert, P. L., van Putten, I., Fleming-Muñoz, D., Curnock, M. 2022, Monitoring social and economic indicators among residents of the Great Barrier Reef region in 2021: a report from the Social and Economic Long-term Monitoring Program (SELTMP) for the Great Barrier Reef, CSIRO Land and Water, Australia.
  • 1157. Lee, H. and Romero, J. 2023, Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • 1160. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 2017, Social Value Assessment Guidelines, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 1161. Australian Bureau of Statistics 2021, Population Change in 2020, Commonwealth of Australia, <https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/population-change-2020>.
  • 1162. SIe, L., Ritchie, B.W. and Lockie, S. 2022, Australian attitudes toward the protection and restoration of the Great Barrier Reef: Summary Findings, Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program.