4.2.2 Natural beauty and natural phenomena (criterion vii)

The natural beauty and natural phenomena of the world heritage property is intrinsically linked to the Region’s biodiversity and ecosystem health (Chapters 2 and 3) and the community’s perception about the Region’s aesthetic values (Section 4.5.2). Evidence presented in these sections is considered in the assessment of natural beauty and natural phenomena. 

The Reef continues to be a superlative natural phenomenon above and below the water which can be measured by the condition of its biodiversity and ecosystem health. For example, humpback whale numbers continue to recover 505 (Section 2.4.14). Ongoing use of the Region’s iconic beautiful places is critically important to support local and international economies, human wellbeing, and stewardship.1066 Safe access for the public and conservation of spectacular scenery has seen ongoing commitment from managers. For example, since 2019 managers have performed health checks of island national parks, developed the Whitsunday Island walking tracks, installed additional public moorings and no-anchoring areas and upgraded the camping grounds on North West Island.38,72,1067

While the Reef’s abundance and diversity of shapes, sizes and colours have not significantly changed since inscription, some land and seascapes have deteriorated. Hard coral cover, for example, has improved since 2019, but this recovery is dominated by a few fast-growing groups of corals.174 Impacts to other iconic ecosystems (such as the southern regions of seagrass meadows, Section 2.3.4) and species (such as marine turtles, Section 2.4.10; and dugongs, Section 2.4.16) have been observed since 2019.

Climate impacts that cause shifts from dominance by corals to other organisms such as turf algae,1068,1069,1070 are likely to affect the colours and patterns on fishes.1066,1068,1071 Fish assemblages on future reefs are likely to be less vibrant, even if coral cover remains high but dominated by highly robust corals, such as Porites.1068,1072 This change in the array of colours on reefs could represent a loss of intrinsic and aesthetic value to humans and may also affect ecological processes, such as camouflage from predators.1068 

The Reef’s natural beauty depends on the way in which people perceive the aesthetic values of the Reef (Section 4.5.2). This perception can be affected by major events, such as mass coral bleaching, and the ways in which these events are communicated to the public.1073,1074 While the majority of respondents in one survey considered the aesthetic beauty of the Reef as outstanding in 2021,1075 there is some evidence of declines in the perception of the condition of the Reef’s natural beauty since mass coral bleaching events in 2016 and 2017.1076,1077 In one survey, there was a significant decline in tourists’ perceptions of the Reef’s aesthetic beauty and their overall satisfaction with their experience among those who visited after the 2016 and 2017 events.1077 Perceptions of threats to the natural beauty of the Reef are also affected by these major events (Section 9.3.1)

‘Beautiful’ is the most common word associated with the Reef

A 2021 sentiment analysis revealed that ‘beautiful’ is the most common word associated with the Great Barrier Reef.1075 People continue to prefer the naturalness of the Reef, being the degree of wilderness, pristineness or state of minimum human influence,1066 over artificial scenes. However, human interventions in response to localised impacts have modified the natural beauty below the water. Since 2019, managers and partners have completed active reef restoration, for example, at Green Island and Bait Reef.32,38,1067,1078  Also for the purposes of interventions, artificial reefs have been installed in some degraded natural reef ecosystems. Underwater artwork has been installed in the Reef to provide novel aesthetic opportunities, but the degree to which they contribute or detract from natural beauty and natural phenomena remains unknown. 

Taken as a whole, the Region’s natural beauty and natural phenomena endures and many elements necessary to maintain outstanding universal value have remained stable since 2019. However, localised deterioration of some underwater vistas by degraded coral assemblages and seagrass meadows has occurred. 

Split-image, where granite boulders can be seen along the bay’s coastline in the upper part of the image and a large colony of foliose growing coral underwater in the bottom part of the image.
Aesthetic beauty above and below water at Arthur Bay. © Matt Curnock 2021
References
  • 32. McLeod, I.M., Hein, M.Y., Babcock, R., Bay, L., Bourne, D.G., et al. 2022, Coral restoration and adaptation in Australia: the first five years, PLoS One 17(11): e0273325.
  • 38. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and Queensland Government 2022, Reef Joint Field Management Program: Annual report summary 2021-2022, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 174. Morais, J., Tebbett, S.B., Morais, R.A. and Bellwood, D.R. 2023, Natural recovery of corals after severe disturbance, Ecology Letters 27(1): e14332.
  • 505. Threatened Species Scientific Committee 2022, Listing advice – Megaptera novaeangliae – humpback whale, Department of Agriculture, Water and Environment, Canberra.
  • 1066. Marshall, N., Marshall, P., Curnock, M., Pert, P., Smith, A., et al. 2019, Identifying indicators of aesthetics in the Great Barrier Reef for the purposes of management, PloS One 14(2): e0210196.
  • 1068. Hemingson, C.R., Mihalitsis, M. and Bellwood, D.R. 2022, Are fish communities on coral reefs becoming less colourful? Global Change Biology 28(10): 3321-3332.
  • 1073. Eagle, L., Hay, R. and Low, D.R. 2018, Competing and conflicting messages via online news media: Potential impacts of claims that the Great Barrier Reef is dying, Ocean & Coastal Management 158: 154-163.
  • 1075. Hobman, E. V., Mankad, A., Pert, P. L., van Putten, I., Fleming-Muñoz, D., Curnock, M. 2022, Monitoring social and economic indicators among residents of the Great Barrier Reef region in 2021: a report from the Social and Economic Long-term Monitoring Program (SELTMP) for the Great Barrier Reef, CSIRO Land and Water, Australia.
  • 1076. Datta, A.W., Wyborn, C., Chaffin, B.C. and Barnes, M.L. 2024, Imagining reef futures after mass coral bleaching events, Environmental Science & Policy 151: 103625.
  • 1077. Curnock, M.I., Marshall, N.A., Thiault, L., Heron, S.F., Hoey, J., et al. 2019, Shifts in tourists’ sentiments and climate risk perceptions following mass coral bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef, Nature Climate Change 9(7): 535-541.