3.4.5 Predation

Predation is the process of animals consuming other animals, and it occurs across varying levels of food webs. The tops of food webs are represented by apex predators, such as great hammerhead and tiger sharks (Section 2.4.8), pelagic fish, birds and marine mammals.823 Mesopredators (or middle-order predators) include many sharks, emperors, snappers, groupers 400 and marine turtles, which eat other animals but are also eaten by apex predators. 

Predation influences the composition and distribution of communities,824 affects behaviour and the evolution of characteristics in prey species 825 and, importantly, transfers energy from the pelagic zone to the reef environment.826

Since 2019, increasing evidence shows that predation may play an important role in controlling crown-of-thorns starfish populations during their planktonic, juvenile and adult life stages. Planktivorous damselfish target crown-of-thorns larvae despite the presence of alternative prey,827,828 while 26 species of invertebrates have been found to prey upon juvenile crown-of-thorns,349 including the red decorator crab which can eat up to 5 juvenile crown-of-thorns starfish a day. The peppermint shrimp eats juvenile crown-of-thorns starfish (up to 4 months old) and damages older juveniles, through partial predation.829 Adult crown-of-thorns starfish are preyed upon by the giant triton snail830 and various species of fish.828 Crown-of-thorns starfish densities are reduced in no-take marine reserves (where predators are protected) compared to unprotected areas open to fishing, further suggesting that predation may help to reduce crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks in the Region.828

Several factors affect the process of predation. Disturbance to habitat (for example, following cyclones or coral bleaching) can damage reef structure, potentially benefiting predators by reducing the availability of shelter for prey species.831 Projected increases in sea surface temperature may see some species moving to cooler habitats to stay within their optimal thermal range 832 or to maintain access to prey.833 Tiger sharks are known to move to higher latitudes during La Niña and lower latitudes during warmer years.833 The increase in temperatures may result in higher metabolic rates that need to be maintained,374 requiring species to eat more to survive. Ocean acidification has been shown to affect sensory systems, affecting how cues are received and processed.834 For example, prey fish may exhibit decreased directionality and responsiveness, while predators commence their strike from a larger distance, suggesting a higher motivation to feed.835

Fishing represents a threat to predation in the Region, through targeted removal of predators.823 The stock status (in 2020) of predatory fish and shark species fished in the Region is sustainable for some (for example, coral trout and several reef sharks) and depleted for others (for example, Australian snapper, pearl perch and Spanish mackerel) (Section 5.4). Predatory species are more abundant in protected areas.836 The Region’s ecosystems remain impacted by a long history of exploitation of apex predators, and populations of some targeted species remain in poor condition.49,837

Natural rates of predation across the ecosystem are likely relatively stable

Evidence suggests there is substantial ecological redundancy among the diverse group of sharks and reef fish that act as mesopredators in the Region.396,394 Although much less is known about predation by smaller fish of mobile invertebrates (other than crown-of-thorns starfish), natural rates of predation across the ecosystem are likely relatively stable due to the complexity and high functional redundancy of coral reef food webs,394,772 and effective connectivity between coastal and offshore habitats across the Region.838

Depredation, where a predator completely or partially consumes an animal caught by fishing gear, is an emerging interest area.839,840,841 Shark depredation has been recorded since the 1800s, and recent anecdotal evidence indicates frequency may be increasing in some areas.407,842,843 The effect of depredation on the Region’s ecosystems is unknown; most studies are fisheries specific.844 

Consideration of the process of predation often focuses on apex predators and mesopredators. Although there is knowledge about predation within other species, such as turtles eating jellyfish 845,846 and invertebrates with varying diets, there is a gap in information regarding the effect of this other predation on prey populations and the Region as a whole. 

Predation affects a wide range of taxa that are subject to varying pressures. Although natural rates of predation are likely relatively stable, the Region’s ecosystems remain impacted by a long history of exploitation of apex predators and populations of some targeted species remain in poor condition. A large group of predators, the sharks and rays, are in poor condition.

References
  • 49. Roff, G., Brown, C.J., Priest, M.A. and Mumby, P.J. 2018, Decline of coastal apex shark populations over the past half century, Communications Biology 1(1): 223.
  • 349. Desbiens, A.A., Mumby, P.J., Dworjanyn, S., Plagányi, ÉE., Uthicke, S., et al. 2023, Novel rubble-dwelling predators of herbivorous juvenile crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster sp.), Coral Reefs 42: 579-591.
  • 374. McMahon, S.J., Munday, P.L. and Donelson, J.M. 2023, Energy use, growth and survival of coral reef snapper larvae reared at elevated temperatures, Coral Reefs 42: 31-42.
  • 394. Roff, G., Doropoulos, C., Rogers, A., Bozec, Y., Krueck, N.C., et al. 2016, The ecological role of sharks on coral reefs, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 31(5): 395-407.
  • 396. Desbiens, A.A., Roff, G., Robbins, W.D., Taylor, B.M., Castro‐Sanguino, C., et al. 2021, Revisiting the paradigm of shark‐driven trophic cascades in coral reef ecosystems, Ecology 102(4): e03303.
  • 400. Lester, E.K., Langlois, T.J., Simpson, S.D., McCormick, M.I. and Meekan, M.G. 2021, Reef‐wide evidence that the presence of sharks modifies behaviors of teleost mesopredators, Ecosphere 12(2): e03301.
  • 407. Hoel, K., Chin, A. and Lau, J. 2022, Clashing conservation values: the social complexities of shark depredation, Biological Conservation 272: 109658.
  • 772. Wolfe, K., Anthony, K., Babcock, R.C., Bay, L., Bourne, D., et al. 2019, Recommendations to maintain functioning of the Great Barrier Reef, Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns.
  • 823. Ceccarelli, D. and Ayling, T. 2010, Role, importance and vulnerability of top predators on the Great Barrier Reef: a review, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
  • 824. Stier, A.C., Stallings, C.D., Samhouri, J.F., Albins, M.A. and Almany, G.R. 2017, Biodiversity effects of the predation gauntlet, Coral Reefs 36: 601-606.
  • 826. Emslie, M.J., Cappo, M., Currey-Randall, L.M., Gonzalez-Rivero, M., Johns, K., et al. 2019, Status and trends of reef fish and benthic assemblages of the far northern Great Barrier Reef, Townsville.
  • 827. Cowan, Z., Ling, S.D., Caballes, C.F., Dworjanyn, S.A. and Pratchett, M.S. 2020, Crown-of-thorns starfish larvae are vulnerable to predation even in the presence of alternative prey, Coral Reefs 39: 293-303.
  • 825. Ahti, P.A., Kuparinen, A. and Uusi-Heikkilä, S. 2020, Size does matter—the eco-evolutionary effects of changing body size in fish, Environmental Reviews 28(3): 311-324.
  • 828. Kroon, F.J., Barneche, D.R. and Emslie, M.J. 2021, Fish predators control outbreaks of crown-of-thorns starfish, Nature Communications 12(1): 6986.
  • 829. Balu, V., Messmer, V., Logan, M., Hayashida-Boyles, A.L. and Uthicke, S. 2021, Is predation of juvenile crown-of-thorns seastars (Acanthaster cf. solaris) by peppermint shrimp (Lysmata vittata) dependent on age, size, or diet? Coral Reefs 40: 641-649.
  • 830. Schlaff, A., Menéndez, P., Hall, M., Heupel, M., Armstrong, T., et al. 2020, Acoustic tracking of a large predatory marine gastropod, Charonia tritonis, on the Great Barrier Reef, Marine Ecology Progress Series 642: 147-161.
  • 831. Triki, Z. and Bshary, R. 2019, Fluctuations in coral reef fish densities after environmental disturbances on the northern Great Barrier Reef, PeerJ 7: e6720.
  • 832. Hill, N.J., Tobin, A.J., Reside, A.E., Pepperell, J.G. and Bridge, T.C. 2016, Dynamic habitat suitability modelling reveals rapid poleward distribution shift in a mobile apex predator, Global Change Biology 22(3): 1086-1096.
  • 833. Niella, Y., Butcher, P., Holmes, B., Barnett, A. and Harcourt, R. 2022, Forecasting intraspecific changes in distribution of a wide-ranging marine predator under climate change, Oecologia 198(1): 111-124.
  • 834. Draper, A.M. and Weissburg, M.J. 2019, Impacts of global warming and elevated CO2 on sensory behavior in predator-prey interactions: a review and synthesis, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7: 72.
  • 835. Domenici, P., Allan, B.J., Lefrançois, C. and McCormick, M.I. 2019, The effect of climate change on the escape kinematics and performance of fishes: implications for future predator–prey interactions, Conservation Physiology 7(1): coz078.
  • 836. Hall, A.E., Sievers, K.T., Kingsford, M.J. 2023, Conservation benefits of no-take marine reserves outweigh modest benefits of partially protected areas for targeted coral reef fishes, Coral Reefs 42(2): 319-333.
  • 837. Kyne, P.M., Heupel, M.R., White, W.T. and Simpfendorfer, C.A. 2021, The Action Plan for Australian Sharks and Rays 2021, National Environmental Science Program, Marine Biodiversity Hub, Hobart.
  • 838. Davis, A. and Pearson, R. 2024, 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement: Summary | Evidence Statement for Question 1.4: How are the GBR’s key ecosystem processes connected from the catchment to the reef and what are the primary factors that influence these connections? in 2022 Scientific Consensus Statement on land-based impacts on Great Barrier Reef water quality and ecosystem condition, eds J. Waterhouse, M. Pineda and K. Sambrook, Commonwealth of Australia and Queensland Government.
  • 839. Mitchell, J.D., Drymon, J.M., Vardon, J., Coulson, P.G., Simpfendorfer, C.A., et al. 2023, Shark depredation: future directions in research and management, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 33(2): 475-499.
  • 840. Clavareau, L., Marzloff, M.P., Tixier, P. and Trenkel, V.M. 2024, A review of depredation modelling across terrestrial and marine realms: State of the art and future directions, Environmental Modelling & Software 176: 106028.
  • 841. Tixier, P., Lea, M., Hindell, M.A., Welsford, D., Mazé, C., et al. 2021, When large marine predators feed on fisheries catches: Global patterns of the depredation conflict and directions for coexistence, Fish and Fisheries 22(1): 31-53.
  • 842. Mitchell, J.D., McLean, D.L., Collin, S.P. and Langlois, T.J. 2018, Shark depredation in commercial and recreational fisheries, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 28: 715-748.
  • 843. Casselberry, G.A., Markowitz, E.M., Alves, K., Russo, J.D., Skomal, G.B., et al. 2022, When fishing bites: understanding angler responses to shark depredation, Fisheries Research 246: 106174.
  • 844. Carmody, H., Langlois, T., Mitchell, J., Navarro, M., Bosch, N., et al. 2021, Shark depredation in a commercial trolling fishery in sub-tropical Australia, Marine Ecology Progress Series 676: 19-35.
  • 845. Ates, R. 1991, Predation on Cnidaria by vertebrates other than fishes, in Coelenterate biology: recent research on cnidaria and ctenophora: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on coelenterate biology, 1989, eds. Anonymous, Springer, pp. 305-307.
  • 846. Arai, M.N. 2005, Predation on pelagic coelenterates: a review, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85: 523-536.